Trail 65 – RAF Thurleigh Part 5 – Development, Research and London’s Third Airport.

Part 4 of this trail saw Thurleigh reach the war’s end and the 306th rise victoriously from early disasters. But, even as the last B-17s roared over the Bedfordshire countryside, the future of Thurleigh was already stirring in whispers and blueprints. The airfield, freshly scarred by the demands of war, seemed poised on the edge of a new era—one that promised to push aircraft faster, higher, and farther than anyone had imagined. Across Britain, minds were turning toward the possibilities of jet power, supersonic flight, and technologies that could transform not just military aviation, but the very way people would travel the skies. Somewhere in these plans, Thurleigh would emerge—not just as a relic of wartime heroism, but as the stage for an ambitious experiment in Britain’s post-war aeronautical future.

Post-War Vision: Thurleigh and the Rise of RAE Bedford

In the immediate post war years, the bulk of what was left after ‘demobbing’, the 306th along with their sister squadron the 305th at Chelveston, moved abroad, the 306th to Geibelstadt, Germany as part of Project ‘Casey jones‘; to photograph 2 million square miles of Europe, Iceland and both north and west Africa. They transferred from base to base, the four squadrons being significantly reduced by the points system, until their final disbandment on Christmas Day, 1946*33.

As the B-17s of the 306th were flying their final missions from Thurleigh, forward-looking minds were already envisioning a future shaped by peace and rapid advancements in aviation. The war had more than proven aviation’s strategic power and hinted at its potential to revolutionise post-war life, particularly through fast and efficient global air travel. The development of the jet engine – pioneered in both Britain and Germany – ushered in a new era where speed and altitude were no longer limited by ‘slow’ piston engines.

With the dawn of the jet age came a fresh frontier: supersonic flight. Many wartime aircraft had already nudged the sound barrier, revealing strange and unpredictable aerodynamic behaviours; behaviours that demanded further study and investigation. This not only posed new scientific challenges, but created huge opportunities for further aviation development. As Britain looked ahead, there was a growing interest into which sites could support such serious, large-scale aeronautical research facilities.

In these closing months of the war, the government recognised that any attempt to carry out this research would require heavy investment in cutting-edge technology. In February 1945, several months before the war’s end, Sir Stafford Cripps, (the new Minister of Aircraft Production), confirmed in the House of Commons that a new national research centre would indeed be created. The question then became where?

The natural choice would have been the already established Royal Aircraft Establishment (RAE), at Farnborough, but it could not expand sufficiently in terms of either its runway, nor its infrastructure, and so an alternative had to be found.

Following a detailed national survey, Bedfordshire was then chosen as the prime location; its gentle rolling landscape and access to several wartime airfields made it an ideal choice. Part of this grand scheme was to create a new independent agency the ‘National Experimental Establishment’, but as time went on, this evolved into the National Aeronautical Establishment (NAE). With its base at Thurleigh, it would eventually be renamed, in 1955, as the Royal Aircraft Establishment Bedford (RAE Bedford).

RAF Thurleigh (as it was still known), with its long wartime runways and open surroundings, was a natural fit. Early thoughts considered it a possible location for a UK test facility to rival the Muroc Field in California’s Mojave Desert (now Edwards Air Force Base). That bold idea involved joining Thurleigh with RAF Twinwood Farm (to the south) and RAF Little Staughton (to the east) via a massive five-mile runway and taxiway, creating one vast experimental complex. However, this ambitious and frankly unrealistic vision was ultimately scaled back, and although some ground work had begun, the full development plan never materialised in this form.

With the idea ‘still on the table’, the programme was pushed ahead, but on a much smaller and by no means less ambitious scale, with both sites at Thurleigh and Twinwood Farm being developed and taking on new roles; both becoming central to Britain’s aviation future.

Development Begins: A New Thurleigh Rises

Development of the new facility was therefore split across the two sites. Firstly, on land near to Milton Ernest, close to the old Twinwood Farm airfield, a network of four powerful, ex Luftwaffe Research Station, wind tunnels were erected. Varying in size and power, each of these would test different aspects of aerodynamic behaviours under different conditions; one for example, measuring 8 feet by 8 feet, could test models in wind speeds up to Mach 5, an unprecedented achievement in post war Britain. *22

Meanwhile, Thurleigh itself was transformed into a highly advanced flight test centre. This required substantial redevelopment of the airfield: buildings were demolished, the  infrastructure overhauled, and some original wartime hangars repurposed – two of these still exist in situ and in use today.

Thurleigh

One of Thurleigh’s wartime hangars (former Aero Flight) still in use today.

Thurleigh’s new runway – measuring 3,400 metres (2.11 miles) long and 97 metres wide, was one of the largest in Europe at the time, and reflected both the size and speed of the aircraft it was going to need to accommodate. Upgraded by the company John Laing, a second runway was also extended reaching over 2,000 metres (1.2 miles) in length, each with a substantial 92 cm*23 of concrete beneath their surface. Even though full development wouldn’t be completed until 1957, the first residents moved in starting their research work as early as 1954.

The work at the new facility, spanned numerous aeronautical fields: aircraft control and handling, blind landing systems, all-weather operations, approach and landing aids, air traffic management, and military vertical take-off and landing systems, which would later culminate in the iconic Harrier jump jet. The site also supported naval aviation research and contributed significantly to the early development of Concorde, contributing to both the aerodynamic and avionic systems of the supersonic airliner.

Throughout the 1950s, the facility’s work was invaluable. The Naval Air Department (NAD) arrived at Thurleigh in mid-1954, formed by merging the Carrier Equipment Department and naval elements of the Aerodynamics Department at Farnborough. Tasked with developing launch and recovery systems for increasingly larger and heavier carrier-based aircraft such as the F-4 Phantom and Blackburn Buccaneer, the NAD’s base was on the northern side of Thurleigh airfield, alongside one of the original unmodified runways of the Second World War. It featured both flush and elevated catapults, arrester gear, a full proving base, and specialist equipment like Catapult Alignment Equipment (CALE) and Jet Blast Deflectors (JBDs). Unique among shore-based facilities, it included a prototype steam catapult system, one that would eventually become standard on naval carriers worldwide. This unique facility also caught the eyes of Britain’s neighbours, being used by the French Navy to test aircraft such as the Étendard and Alizé, highlighting its world-class research and development status.

The NAD operated at Thurleigh until 1970, when it was disbanded following the 1967 Defence White Paper, which ended the Royal Navy’s fixed-wing  aircraft carrier operations. As a consequence, and with little need for fixed wing research, the naval research facility at Thurleigh closed. *24 *25

Not long after the NAD’s arrival though, in 1955, the Flight Division of the Aerodynamics Department – known as ‘Aero Flight’ joined them at Thurleigh. This division was comprised of three sections: Supersonic Flight, Subsonic Flight, and Dynamic Stability Research. They investigated aircraft stability, control, and flying qualities right across the speed spectrum. Over time, their work expanded into vertical take-off and landing systems, flight simulation, and helicopter trials. To achieve these aims, Aero Flight regularly used various aircraft models including the Gloster Meteor, Hawker Hunter, De Havilland Venom, and English Electric Canberra (WT327), (WK163), (WK163), all in the famous ‘Raspberry Ripple’ paint scheme. They also tested purpose-built experimental aircraft such as the Boulton Paul P.111; Avro 707; Short SC1 (XG900, XG905) and SB5; Hunting Jet Flap; Fairey FD2; Hawker P1127 (XP831, XP984) and Handley Page HP115 (XP115), all of which appeared regularly at Thurleigh.*26

The SC1 (XG905) at RAE Bedford

In 1957, a third unit arrived at the site: the Blind Landing Experimental Unit (BLEU) which was originally formed in 1945 to develop early aircraft blind approach systems. Initially tested on De Havilland Devon aircraft, the BLEU progressed to Canberras, going on later to equip many military aircraft, including the ‘V’ bombers, with automatic landing systems – technology now standard on civil airliners worldwide.

Trident Two G-AVFA landing at Thurleigh, March 1968 as part of the testing for the  ILS ‘Triplex’ automatic landing system (FAST) *27

The 1950s and 60s, saw the pinnacle of the Cold War, with countries world Wide placed on a war footing, ready for what seemed to be yet another terrifying conflict. With the RAF’s first ‘Blue Danube’ atomic bomb being delivered to RAF Wittering in 1953, the UK was ready, and able, to retaliate should the need arise. In preparation for such an event, the ‘V’ Force bombers would be dispersed to airfields across the country ready to take off at a moments notice. Thurleigh, with its extensive runway, was earmarked to hold four such aircraft each one sitting on its pan ready for a quick and decisive launch.*28

1960s: The Search for London’s Third Airport and Thurleigh’s Role

Even with the Cold War climbing towards its pinnacle, aviation interests in Thurleigh continued to grow, and by the mid-1960s, Britain was beginning to face the growing pressures of low-cost air travel, and nowhere was this felt more than at its major airports – London Heathrow and Gatwick, which were already struggling to keep up with demand. A White Paper “The Third London Airport” published in May 1967 listed nine possible sites, including Thurleigh, but ruled out many of these due to conflicts with nearby military installations. In response, the government set up the Roskill Commission in 1968, who went on to conduct a detailed two-year investigation into a number of potential sites  all capable of becoming London’s third airport.

The inquiry followed a detailed five-stage process. First, four candidate locations were shortlisted: Foulness in Essex; former RAF Nuthampstead in Hertfordshire; Wing in Buckinghamshire (Clublington) and Thurleigh in Bedfordshire.

Background information on each site was then published, followed by public hearings held near each of the shortlisted locations. These hearings provided an opportunity for local authorities, campaigners, and residents alike to express their views and raise concerns.

Reaction in Bedfordshire – both to the Thurleigh and Wing proposals – was largely unfavourable. Local residents expressed concerns, both verbally and through graffiti – “Not Thurleigh” – about noise, pressure on roads, public services, and the broader environmental impact. County  Councils, including Bedfordshire, opposed the airport plans outright.

In the north of the county, those living around Thurleigh formed the Bedford Airport Resistance Association (BARA) to give local opposition a voice, while in the south, similar resistance was growing against the Wing plan. Yet, not everyone objected. A smaller local group, the Thurleigh Emergency Committee for Democratic Action (TECDA), welcomed the idea, arguing that an airport could boost jobs and bring long-term economic benefits to the area. The resultant hearings all took place during 1969.

Stage Three saw the Commission’s own Research Team gather technical data and examine submissions from expert witnesses and interested parties. This work fed into a comprehensive report, which formed the basis for further discussion in Stage Four. At this point, members of the Commission met with representatives from key organisations – including Bedfordshire County Council, BARA and TECDA – to debate the findings and test individual arguments.

The final stage was a lengthy series of formal hearings – 74 days in all – held at the Piccadilly Hotel in London. Here, all sides presented their evidence, with cross-examinations led by barristers representing the various parties. After the exhaustive process was over, the Commission recommended, by majority vote, that the new airport be built at Wing, accompanied by further plans for an  additional “Airport City.” Only one member disagreed favouring Foulness as the better site.

Ultimately though, Wing was dropped and the government shifted its focus to Maplin Sands, close to Foulness. However, later in 1974, in the face of public pressures, that plan was also abandoned, and attention turned to other pre-existing sites. Luton was briefly considered, but by 1979, the decision was made: Stansted would be developed as London’s third airport, leaving Thurleigh’s long term airport development plans permanently shelved.*29

1970s: Consolidation and Systems Integration at RAE Bedford

Meanwhile at the now renamed RAE Bedford (the airfield no longer under military ownership) the 1970s brought significant organisational changes. In 1974, the various departments were merged to create the Flight Systems Department, bringing together a diverse range of expertise under the one roof. This integration fostered a comprehensive, systems-based approach to aeronautical research and development, moving beyond the previously isolated group of technical fields.

The new department was structured into three core areas: Flight Dynamics (FS1), Operational Systems (FS2), and Common Services (FS6). Collectively, these units covered flight dynamics and control, operational systems & flight management, and flight simulation technology.*30

This broader, interdisciplinary approach allowed RAE Bedford to expand its research across both military and civilian aviation sectors. Employing more modern aircraft – including the Tornado and later the Typhoon – enabled the development of sophisticated radar, tracking, landing, and handling systems. These advancements would shape aviation technology well into the coming decades.

The End of an Era and a New Beginning: Thurleigh in the 1990s and Beyond

By the early 1990s, shifts in defence policy led to a significant reduction in government-funded test flying activities. In 1994, official flying operations at Thurleigh came to an end, and the airfield was officially closed. All ongoing research activities were transferred to Boscombe Down, marking the close of a pivotal chapter in Thurleigh’s aviation history. Despite this closure though, the eastern runway continued to see occasional use by civil aircraft, preserving a faint echo of its once glorious former life.

In 1996, ownership of much of the site changed hands again, with the majority being sold to St. Modwen Properties Ltd, a company specialising in the regeneration of brownfield sites. Meanwhile, a smaller portion of the airfield remained under the control of QinetiQ, the successor to the Ministry of Defence’s Defence Evaluation and Research Agency (DERA), allowing continued military research on advanced defence systems. However, by 2008, QinetiQ too had left, and the once-bustling research complex at Thurleigh gradually fell into disrepair.*31

The Rise of The Phoenix: Thurleigh’s Comeback.

A new chapter in Thurleigh’s long book then began in 1999, when the former Formula 1 driver Jonathan Palmer and his MotorSport Vision Group (MSV), purchased a 384 acre section of the eastern side of the airfield. Palmer went on to design and develop the site into four different circuits utilising 5 miles of original airfield and newly developed track, providing a private circuit for participants to test their skills in high speed racing.*32

A year later, in 2010, marking seventy years since the start of Thurleigh’s crucial role in the Second World War, Thurleigh airfield was re-licensed by the Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) and given the new name Bedford Aerodrome, symbolising a return to aviation.

Whilst the main part of the business is owned and run by Palmer’s Group, civil aviation is permitted and the two projects run alongside each other on this former wartime airfield.

During 2025 the hard runways were out of use until further notice, however, a new grass runway was provided and its use was by arrangement with the operators permission. Helicopter flights continued as usual, so, whilst limited aviation does still continue at Thurleigh, its main operations lay elsewhere. Part of the airfield has since been converted into a business park and its disused runways store considerable quantities of vehicles ready for the open market. A large portion of the perimeter track continues to be utilised by the aforementioned car racing organisation for motor sport activities.

A former small arms building not far from Galsey Wood and the former bomb store, has been converted into a small but excellent 306th Bombardment Group Museum run by local volunteers, and the memorial which once stood in the village, has now been moved and placed outside the museum appropriately on the airfield itself.

Thurleigh

The former small arms building is now a well run museum.

Although no longer a hub of government research, Thurleigh’s legacy now endures as a testament to British aviation history — a site that witnessed both the resilience of wartime efforts and the ambitious technological strides of the post-war jet age.

Throughout this trail we have seen how Thurleigh evolved from a wartime bomber base into a cornerstone of British aviation research and development. During the Second World War, it served as home to the USAAF’s 306th Bomb Group, from where young crews flew dangerous missions – many never to return. The cost was high, and the loss of so many lives remains a poignant part of its story. In the post-war years, the site became part of RAE Bedford, pushing the boundaries of flight technology and innovation. Though official flying ended in 1994, its legacy endures – rooted in sacrifice, resilience, and remarkable achievement.

Today, Thurleigh stands as more than an airfield – it is a testament to the daring spirit of those who dared to fly, build, and innovate. Its story is a mix of triumphs and trials, quiet reinventions, and bold leaps into the unknown – a narrative that continues to echo across its runways.

Thurleigh – 306th BG Museum.

The 306th Museum is located in a former small arms building (building 185) close to the bomb site at Galsey Woods. It can be accessed by following the perimeter track (now road) around from the main entrance to the site through a gate. There is a small amount of free parking available and access is also free.

The museum is run by volunteers, and is well stocked with photos and artefacts pertaining to the 306th and Thurleigh. It was donated by Johnathan Palmer when part of the woods were removed.

Inside are various uniforms, photographs and artefacts, both a home front display, a jeep and a ‘pub’ bar.

Its an excellent little museum and well worth the effort of visiting.  More information can be found by visiting their website.

Thurleigh

One of the displays inside the museum.

Sources and further reading (Thurleigh)

*1 Bedfordshire Archives website. Accessed 7 July 2025.

*2 Bedfordshire Archives website [ref: WW2/AR/CO2/3] Accessed 7 July 2025.

*3 Bedford Aerodrome History website. Accessed 7 July 2025.

*4 Miller, D.L. ” Eighth Air Force” Aurum 2008

*5 Miller, D.L. “ Eighth Air Force” Aurum 2008

*6 Goodrum. A., “School of Aces” Amberley Books 2019.

*7 Miller, D.L. “ Eighth Air Force” Aurum 2008

*8 Freeman. R., “The B-17 Flying Fortress Story“. Arms and Armour. 1998

*9 Freeman, R., “The Mighty Eighth“. Arms and Armour. 1989.

*10 306th BG War Diaries via 306th BG Historical Association website. Accessed 8 July 2025.

*11 MACR 15502 via 306th BG Historical Association website. Accessed 8 July 2025.

*12 MACR via 306th BG Historical Association website. Accessed 8 July 2025.

*13 Mission reports 1943 via 306th BG Historical Association website. Accessed 8 July 2025.

*14 306th Combat war Diary March 1943 via 306th BG Historical Association website. Accessed 9 July 2025.

*15 306th BG Mission Report 17th April, 1943 via 306th BG Historical Association website Accessed 9 July 2025

*16 Mission Report, October 14th 1943 via 306th BG Historical Association Website Accessed 11 July 2025

*17 306th War diaries October 1943, via 306th BG Historical Association Website Accessed 11 July 2025

*18 Bedfordshire Archives [ref: WW2/AR/CO2/3] via website Accessed July 11 2025

*19 Mission Report 24th April 1944, via 306th BG Historical Association website. Accessed 11 July 2025

*20 306th BG War Combat Diaries via 306th BG Historical Association website. Accessed 11 July 2025.

*21 306th BG Mission Report April 1945, via 306th BG Historical Association website. Accessed 18 July 2025.

*22 Farnborough Air Sciences Trust (FAST) website Accessed 19 July 2025

*23 Osbourne, M., “Defending Bedfordshire“. Fonthill Media Ltd, 2021

*24 Bedford Aeronautical Heritage Group website Accessed 19 July 2025

*25 Farnborough Air Sciences Trust (FAST) website Accessed 19 July 2025

*26 Bowles. M., “Work and Play – Tales of an Unremarkable Engineer“. Austin Macauley Publishers Ltd. 2024 Accessed 20 July 2025

*27 Farnborough Air Sciences Trust (FAST) Website Accessed 19 July 2025

*28 Osbourne, M., “Defending Bedfordshire“. Fonthill Media Ltd, 2021

*29 Bedfordshire Archives website Accessed July 19 2025

*30 Farnborough Air Sciences Trust (FAST) website Accessed 19 July 2025

*31 QinetiQ website. Accessed 20 July 2025

*32 Bedford Autodrome accessed 26 July 2025

*33 Boyd, R.J., “Project Casey Jones 1945 – 46” PennState Hazelton Campus Library.

National Archives: AIR 27/1065/1

American Air Museum in Britain Website. Accessed July 2025

Coffey, T., “Decision over Schweinfurt“. Magnum Books 1980

Woodley. C., “Stanstead Airport – Through Time“. Amberley Publishing. 2012. Accessed July 23 2025

National Archives Website .”Roskill Commission on the Third London Airport” Accessed July 23 2025

The Bedford aerodrome website contains extensive material on the current and some historical use of Thurleigh.

The Bedford Aeronautical Heritage Group website (now closed but accessible) contains information about the work and history of RAE Bedford. It has since been moved to the Farnborough Air Services Trust (FAST) website which also offers endless information about the services of both RAE Bedford and RAE Farnborough.

Bedfordshire and Luton Archive and Record Service has an extensive collection of Third London Airport material as part of the Bedfordshire County Council archive which includes material for all four original sites. It also has material from BARA.

PPRuNe forum has information, photos and personal information about the research at both Thurleigh and Twinwood Farm.

Airfields of Britain Conservation Trust website. Accessed 24 July 2025

Trail 65 – RAF Thurleigh Part 4 – A return to Schweinfurt, a Royal visit and the War’s End.

Last time, in Part 3, we followed the 306th Bomb Group through their difficult arrival at Thurleigh, enduring poor conditions, training accidents, and costly missions over occupied Europe. Despite setbacks- including the loss of Captain Paul Adams’s crew – the Group adapted, honed their tactics, and began proving themselves in battle. Now, as 1943 drew on, the challenges only grow sharper: missions stretched deeper into enemy territory, German resistance stiffened, and the winter skies of northern Europe offered no mercy. For the 306th, the coming year would demand courage and endurance on a scale they had never faced before.

Another party of officials along with a squad of Brigadier Generals returned to Thurleigh on July 27th, the event being to present the Congressional Medal of Honour to Sgt. Maynard Smith who, as ball turret gunner, performed admirably on May 1st 1943. The B-17 he was in, had been attacked by three enemy aircraft setting it on fire. Three of the crew baled out leaving Lt. Smith to douse the fire enabling pilot Lt. Johnson to save the aircraft by landing it in south-west England.

As summer gave way to autumn, the toll on men became increasingly evident. The four Groups of the Eighth Air Force that had led the way from the summer of 1942 – the 91st, 303rd, 305th and 306th, were all exhausted and battle weary. Signs of stress and ‘battle fatigue’ were becoming more and more common. Heavy drinking, temporary blindness, shaking, insomnia, nausea, weight loss, horrific nightmares and violent tempers were a mere scratch on the surface of what was being witnessed. The men desperately needed rest, yet reinforcements and replacements were slow to arrive, leaving them to continue missions under increasingly perilous odds.

USAAF personnel on the control tower at Thurleigh airfield [Z50-122-45]

USAAF personnel on the control tower at Thurleigh airfield [ref: Z50/122/45] (Bedfordshire Archives website)

Return to Schweinfurt: The October 14th Massacre

When the mission curtain was drawn back on October 14th, the air in the briefing room must have felt heavy – Schweinfurt. The first trip there after the disastrous mission of August 17th, 1943, which almost caused the collapse of the Eighth Air Force, with the loss of so many aircraft.

In amongst the various crews, those who had experienced that traumatic event cursed and dropped their heads, whilst newcomers struggled to grasp the danger.

Schweinfurt lay deep int heart of the Nazi homeland, almost to the Czechoslovakian border. To get there, formations had to fly 500 miles into enemy territory, a six hour flight of which four were on oxygen and at altitude. Every step of the way was heavily defended by Flak and fighters, the odds of returning dropped like a stone.

The 306th dispatched eighteen aircraft, take off time 10:25 hrs, making a total of 320 aircraft from the 1st, 2nd and 3rd Bombardment Divisions. 196 P-47s would escort, but only just into enemy territory leaving the bombers to fend for themselves in the face of several hundred fierce and deadly accurate 88mm anti-aircraft guns.

The 368th “Eager Beavers” were fortunately for them, rostered ‘off’ that week and so did not take part. The 369th provided seven, the 368th and 423rd the remainder between them.

The mission was to go wrong from the start. Bad weather caused issues with forming up, mechanical problems prevented a full ‘maximum effort’. Groups were lost in thick cloud over England and several become lost and out of formation when they did get to their allocated station. For the 306th, they were able to put up eighteen aircraft, in the high position above the 92nd BG led by Colonel Peaslee.

Once over enemy territory three B-17s of the 306th were forced to return due to mechanical problems, then at around 1:00pm, the escorting P-47s had to leave, and immediately swarms of around 300 Luftwaffe fighters pounced on the bomber stream. Between the Rhine and the target, rockets and bombs were dropped on the bombers many exploding harmlessly in the open, but canon fire from forward attacking fighters, as many as twenty at a time, ripped into the B-17s. One crewman described the scene like a ‘parachute invasion’ with so many chutes being deployed from falling bombers.*16

By the time they had begun the bomb run, the 306th were down to just six aircraft, the 92nd eight – only marginally more than other units. Over the target, the 306th had just five bombers dropping their ordnance, ten were missing all believed shot down. Of those five, four had received heavy damage from flak, canon or rockets leaving only one untouched.

A common site at many airfields across Britain. Thurleigh ambulances await the return of their bombers. (IWM UPL 18748)

The return flight home was thankfully ‘uneventful’, the Luftwaffe fighters concentrating on those bombers still approaching or arriving over the city. But the 306th had been decimated, all but one aircraft having been shot down, returned early, damaged by flak or canon. Estimates afterwards suggest that 75% of Schweinfurt’s ball-bearing industry (which produced 50% of Germany’s total output) had been destroyed. As good as the results were thought to be, Schweinfurt had once again been a slaughter for the Thurleigh men.

The next day the 306th was stood down, there simply wasn’t enough aircraft to put up, it had been another black day indeed for those stationed at Thurleigh.

Words of Recognition, Echoes of Sacrifice

A week later Sir Charles Portal, Air Marshall said in acknowledgement to the efforts of the Eighth, “The U.S. Eighth Air Force has earned for itself during the past weeks a reputation that the Royal Air Force will never forget. The Schweinfurt raid may well go down in history as one of the decisive air actions  of this war, and it may prove to have saved countless lives by depriving the enemy of a great part of his means of resistance.” *17

Into a New Year: Transition and Tension at Thurleigh

As time always does, 1943 merged into 1944 and the war rolled on. Progress in Europe was slow but behind the scenes plans were afoot for the invasion of the continent. With poor weather, flights were limited and as a result January bore witness to just a small number of losses, with almost all aircraft returning safely to base.

On the ground, training continued with a gas training exercise on the base. What was meant to be a safe exercise turned out to be anything but. Driven by the wind, gas was blown over neighbouring fields where farmer Arthur Filsell was working. The gas, needless to say, caused him severe health issues. *18

January’s record was reflected in February, with the 306th achieving a new record for missions – twelve – almost one every two days of the month. It was also the month that saw the death of Lt. Roskovitch, the first airman to achieve his mission quota of twenty-five operations previously. Throughout the month, losses were minimal, but damage from accurate and intense flak was high, with many aircraft returning with extensive damage – such was the strength of the B-17.

As the invasion plans came nearer to their fruition, new records were set again at Thurleigh. The number of operations flown increased from February’s twelve to sixteen, and as an ironic reward, the number of operations in a tour also increased, rising from twenty-five to thirty. With the Luftwaffe noted by their absence, the chances of survival were thought to be increasing.

Shattered Hopes: The Oberpfaffenhofen Disaster

However, the optimism was to bite back not long after. In April 1944, another mission took twenty-five aircraft to Oberpfaffenhoffen in southern Germany, a long route that took them across the German heartland. The twenty-five B-17s were part of a much larger formation of thirteen Combat Wings totalling 524 B-17s and 230 B-24s, that spilt to attack three targets: Leipheim, Gablingen and Oberpfaffenhoffen.

Departing at 09:00 hrs, the 306th’s group, made up of sixteen aircraft in the low group, six in the high and another six as spares, headed to Beachy Head where they formed up and departed to France at 11:00 hrs. Keeping south of Paris they headed to Stuttgart and onto Augsburg. At 12:50 the P-47 escort had to return home reaching the extent of their flying endurance. Immediately, enemy aircraft honed in on the formation strategically attacking the group leaders. A few widely spread Mustangs gave what support they could, but the shear numbers of enemy aircraft simply overwhelmed them.

By 12:35 the full might of the Luftwaffe had been unleashed, and for forty minutes they attacked continuously using a new full frontal wave consisting of between four and eleven fighters at a time. In conjunction, the enemy attacked from both the 2:00 and 11:00 positions splitting the defensive fire-power of the bombers.

Flak was ‘meagre’ but very accurate causing extensive damage to a number of aircraft and bringing one down. Fighter attacks brought down another nine.

The 306th had again been decimated. Almost half of those sent out failed to return, of those that did many had damage and / or casualties. The ‘soft’ targets of early 1944 could no longer be deemed ‘soft’.*19

The Path to Invasion: Record-Breaking in May; D-Day and Beyond

As raids intensified the Groups returned to Berlin, the 306th hitting Berlin no less than four times in May. Another new high was set in both the number of sorties flown, and with the tonnage of bombs dropped. In addition, another new record of twenty operations was set for the month. Despite this, losses were zero, whilst claiming several enemy aircraft shot down or damaged.

On D-Day, 6th June, the 306th supported ground troops as they breached the Normandy beachhead. Bombing howitzer installations inland, road junctions at Caen and Bridges over the River Orne; they encountered a great deal of heavy cloud. With many aircraft resorting to PFF equipment, results were difficult to ascertain. A change in targets mid month then saw the group sent to bomb ‘Noball‘ targets, the “Pilotless planes launching platforms” (V1) in France, but low cloud prevented bombing and all but two aircraft brought their bombs home.

By the end of the month the group were back to Berlin, bombing targets in the city. With another increase in operations, especially in support of D-Day, more records were again broken. A greater tonnage of bombs were dropped in this month than in the first eight months of their tour of operations. In addition, and despite the high records, losses were amongst the lowest in any 30 day period. Post D-Day, the limit of thirty operations was increased yet again to an incredible thirty-five. Even with the increase, many gunners were reported to be nearing the end of their tour, many not having fired at an enemy aircraft as they had been so absent from the combat zone.

A Royal Tribute: The ‘Rose of York‘ Christening

The 6th July 1944, saw a highlight with a royal visit for a special christening. The party included HRH Princess Elizabeth who was here to christen B-17 #42-102547 “Rose of York“. Joining her were King George VI, Queen Elizabeth, Lady Patricia Hambleden (Lady in waiting) and a selection of other Royal Guests and Generals including Lt. General James Doolittle.

Just prior to the dedication taking place, a formation of fifty-two B-17s flew over the airfield marking the occasion. The Princess then broke a bottle of cider over the chin turret and met each member of the crew in turn. After a tour of the airfield and lunch in the mess,  the Royal party departed having made a huge impact on the personnel on the base.

King George VI, Queen Elizabeth, Princess Elizabeth and General James Doolittle, visit the 306th BG in order to christen B-17 “Rose of York” in honour of the Princess. (@IWM FRE 1155)

Accidents and Celebrations: Summer at Thurleigh

With such poor weather dominating the summer months that year, many bombs already fused and live, were brought back home to Thurleigh. These were placed in a distant revetment for safety but on the 30th July, one went off causing a chain reaction that led to twenty-four exploding, shaking the distant windows of the headquarter’s building. No one was hurt in the blast, which saw a huge column of black smoke rise high into the Thurleigh sky. A nearby B-17 was so severely damaged it had to be written off and earmarked for salvage.

A week later, another twenty-four bombs were detonated in a controlled explosion. The location of the ‘dump’, whilst being the safest option, had prevented aircraft from using the taxiway, but now they were all cleared away, the perimeter track was opened and ground movements could operate easily once more.

The 9th September marked the second anniversary of the 306th’s presence in the European Theatre of Operations. To celebrate the day, the entire group was given the day off to watch and enjoy a range of entertainment including a carnival, ball games and music performed by Glenn Miller’s band. Dances were held in the hangar and personnel had the opportunity to view a Ju88, Me109 and FW 190 that had all been captured. The only low point of the day being the sad news of the suicide of Corporal Robert Bickston of the 367th BS.

Chaff, Fog, and Tragedy: Autumn in the Air

By now, the Americans had been using ‘chaff’ for some time, a product like the RAF’s ‘Window’ which utilised strips of metal foil that caused interference and confusion on the enemy radar screens. To test this further and determine exactly what interference it did cause and which method of discharge was the best, crews of the 306th flew to Farnborough to perform  four runs depositing ‘chaff’ from various points in the aircraft. These tests began on September 19th, with the first run dropping no chaff at all, thus giving a base line indication. On the second, it was discharged by the radio operator from his position in the aircraft. On the third, the discharge point was moved to the bomb bay “Razzle Dazzle style” (a more chaotic and less organised style) and on the last run, the chaff  was dropped prior to the aircraft turning onto the bomb-run. Once completed, the data was assimilated and all the results examined. These proved to be “very interesting and informational“.*20

Britain’s weather had long been a challenge for flying operations, and the autumn of 1944 offered no respite. Poor visibility was a constant hazard, often contributing to accidents both in the air and on the ground. While clear skies typically reduced the risk, they were no guarantee of safety. A brief lapse in concentration could, and often did, result in disaster – as the 306th Bomb Group tragically discovered on 22 October 1944.

As the formation made its way back across the North Sea from Hannover, two B-17s from the same squadron collided mid-air. The first, B-17 #44-8099 of the 423rd Bomb Squadron, flown by 1st Lt. Harry Aylea Jr., was in the No. 1 position of the high squadron. Flying nearby in the No. 4 slot was B-17 #43-37976, nicknamed “Suzy”, piloted by Captain Joseph Mathis.

At around 12,000 feet, with a total of 19 airmen on board the two aircraft (ten and nine respectively), the lead bomber began to climb, reducing speed as it did so. Suzy, flying very close beneath, attempted to maintain position – but the gap was too tight. The aircraft collided, sending both into uncontrollable spins. As they fell from the sky, Suzy exploded.

The crash occurred over water, and an immediate air-sea rescue operation was launched to search for survivors. Of the nineteen men aboard, only one was found alive – Staff Sergeant H. Key Jr., the tail gunner from #44-8099. Two bodies were later recovered, but the rest were declared missing in action.

Meanwhile, as the surviving aircraft neared their home bases, the weather over Bedfordshire worsened rapidly. Visibility dropped, and in the poor conditions two returning formations of Chelveston’s 305th Bomb Group – approached from different directions – crossing paths directly over Thurleigh airfield. A collision then followed, with both aircraft exploding on impact and scattering wreckage across the station. Much of the debris fell onto the 367th’s dispersal area. Tragically, there were no survivors and the weather had claimed yet more victims.

Two B-17s of the 305th BG collide over Thurleigh in thick fog. October 22nd, 1944, (IWMFRE 10489)

The poor weather prevented many flights over the following weeks, and so ground talks took up a large portion of aircrew time. Despite this, fourteen missions were carried out, two visually and twelve using PFF with generally good results. To date, some 73,000 hours of flying had taken place and 160 aircraft had been lost to various causes, many along with their crews.

This poor weather continued on almost relentlessly into the last months of the year scrubbing many operations into mainland Europe. But, undaunted, 1945 arrived and 1944 was seen out in style at Thurleigh airfield. Christmas meals were served to those on base, whilst some who had managed to get airborne,  had diverted to other bases forcing them to have their celebrations elsewhere. New Year likewise was celebrated with large quantities of music, food and needless to say drink. Spirits were high, and many personnel were convinced  that the new year would bring an end to what now seemed to be an endless conflict.

The end of the year also signified the end of the inter-base football season. Thurleigh played three matches culminating in a 12-0 victory over fellow teams at Grafton Underwood. On the sports field as in the air, the year had ended with Thurleigh achieving good successes; four wins, two losses and three ties.

Christmas at War: The End of 1944 and the Final Push into 1945

Unbeknown to everyone, including those at Thurleigh, 1945 would indeed see the end of the war. With only five more months to go,  their gut feelings and hopes of peace, were finally coming to fruition.

The beginnings of 1945 saw major movements in Europe on both the eastern and western fronts. The Russians, making huge advances into German held territory, were driving their way into Germany. From the Baltic to the Carpathian Mountains five enormous armies pushed to the banks of the Oder, a mere 40 miles from the German capital Berlin.

Battling the extreme cold weather and constant fog, the western armies were held in the Ardennes facing a strong and determined enemy who were now making a last ditch effort to break through the allied lines. But as the poor weather continued, many flights from UK bases were prevented from occurring and thus dropping much needed supplies to both those on the entrenched front line and those serving behind in hospitals and support services.

But some flights did get away; the 306th managing to play their part by flying 544 sorties in January, attacking mainly enemy communication centres along the front. With low fuel stocks and a high attrition of experienced crews, the Luftwaffe were largely unopposing, so losses for the Thurleigh crews were kept to a minimum.

With the eventual breakout of the Ardennes, the German front began to crumble. The Eighth Air Force and the 306th made a return to Berlin causing further considerable damage to the city, and as the allied forces pushed ever further into Germany, Thurleigh supported the advance with crews hitting numerous strategic targets: oil, communication lines, transportation routes, military camps and jet airfields among many others. With bordering on almost total control of the sky no aircraft were lost by the 306th.

But as the allied forces pushed toward the capital, the U-boat menace remained at large. Submarine pens located along the coast were still in operation and needed eliminating. The problem with these structures was that they were very difficult to not only hit, but to destroy as well, largely due to the incredibly thick reinforced concrete they were constructed of. The RAF and USAAF had tried countless times to destroy these buildings with little success: conventional weapons simply ‘bouncing off’ like ping pong balls.

Secret Weapons: The Disney Bomb Trials

With both the British and Americans carrying out investigations and trials into new and more powerful bombs, the possibility of destroying these bunkers moved slowly closer. It was thought, a British development, the ‘Disney bomb’,  may provide the answer.

The bomb, designed by a Royal Naval Captain, Edward Terrell, was of a long thin design that could be slung beneath a heavy bomber and launched at its target from a high altitude. With added rocket propulsion, the bomb could reach speeds just short of 1,000 mph punching its way through thick concrete into the pen where it would explode destroying the contents  in this case the U-Boat.

Although a British design, the USAAF trialled it between February and April 1945, with the 306th using them for the first time in an operation on March 30th against the Submarine pens near to Farge on the Vesser River. Major Witt led twelve aircraft, (including two PFF)  in two groups of six. Unfortunately, 4/10th cloud cover, forced the lead group into making four passes over the target before they could get a good sighting and thus release their bombs.

Whilst the reports after the raid were good,  little was gained long term from the Disney bombs as they were too difficult to accurately use against such small targets from high altitude, and so the trials ended without any major successes.

B-17 #43-38910 ‘Salvoin Sachem‘ with Disney Bomb on  a Torpedo trailer. The bomb carrier can be seen between the engine and the fuselage. *21

War’s End: Honour, Reflection and the Final Missions

With both east and west fronts meeting up in April 1945, the German war machine effectively collapsed. Doenitz took over after Hitler’s death and Berlin fell into allied hands. The 306th completed fifteen sorties, but no bombings were carried out after the 19th due to potential targets being overrun by the allied forces and so risking ‘friendly fire’ incidents.

After that, the Group essentially stood down. A few leaflets flights were made by the 369th dropping newspaper, propaganda leaflets and other material over Holland, Belgium and Germany.

During May and the last days of the war, these leaflet drops became the norm along with ‘cooks’ tours over Europe. Essentially tours for ground staff, allowing them to see for themselves the damage inflicted on Nazi Germany by the combined heavy bombing of the RAF and USAAF.

When peace was declared and the war finally over, the 306th stood tall. After participating in some of the fiercest air battles of the Second World War, they had come through with great achievements. Tales of heroism were rewarded with two Medals of Honour and Purple Hearts were numerous. The 369th BS had flown an unprecedented forty-two consecutive missions without loss. As a group though, losses had been incurred, and many young and brave men had been lost in the fight against Nazi Germany. Some 177 aircraft had been shot down or lost, and over 730 men had been killed with over 800 more taken prisoner. The 306th had played their part with great courage and sacrifice.

Part 5 takes us beyond the climate of conflict and into the work of research and development. Thurleigh becomes a hub of aviation excellence, the experimentation takes over and a new owner eventually takes control.

The entire history can be read in Trail 65.

Trail 65 – RAF Thurleigh Part 3 – Tough Reforms and Great Achievements.

Part 2 gave us an insight into Thurleigh’s transformation as a USAAF base bringing the American 306th Bomb Group, whose early months were marked by harsh conditions, inexperience, and heavy losses. Yet through resilience and innovation, they adapted quickly. With these lessons learned, the Group now faced the escalating intensity of 1943’s air battles over occupied Europe.

Under Siege: New Tactics, Devastation in December and Heroic Returns

Not only were the Luftwaffe now changing tactics by attacking head on, but they were also developing other methods and weapons to down these heavy bombers.

By attacking in rotation, one group being replaced by another as they refuelled and rearmed, the Luftwaffe fighters were able to keep up an almost endless attack on the formation; fresh eyes and ammunition gradually sapping the gunner’s energy.

This was one such tactic used on the 20th December 1942. After the escort of Spitfires had left and the bomber formation approached the target, they were attacked by a new group of fifty or so FW-190s. The 306th took the full force of the attack losing four aircraft with another two crash landing in England. A further twenty-nine were badly damaged, some even written off. The vulnerability of the unescorted heavy bomber had become all too apparent.

In November and December, the 306th Bomb Group continued operations against targets in France with mixed success, hampered at times by poor weather, mechanical issues, and crew illnesses. On 7th  December, many aircraft returned without releasing their bombs due to heavy cloud cover, and the following day a mission over Lille saw Captain Adam’s aircraft shot down and another bomber badly damaged, with several crews breaking protocol to protect it until all returned safely. During November alone, the group was recognised with twenty-six Air Medals, a Distinguished Flying Cross for Colonel Overcracker, and two Purple Hearts for wounded airmen.

A New Chapter; Thurleigh Faces Tough Reforms

December 9th 1942 bore witness to a remarkable event in history when Thurleigh airfield was officially handed over from RAF control to the USAAF, the first such event to have taken place.  The change in ownership didn’t however, immediately affect operations and the closing month of the year saw further flights into enemy territory with yet more losses. These increase in losses were met with a corresponding decline in morale.

But as Christmas approached, there was a change in sentiment with a festive Christmas diner and New Year celebrations in which a newly formed band played music well into the night. The end of the year went out with many regrets but brought high hopes for a much better and happier 1943.

The dawning of the new year then saw big changes occur at Thurleigh. In command of the Eighth Air Force was General Spaatz, who at the time was meeting with with General Eisenhower to discuss the future of the North African Air Force, leaving Ira Eaker in charge of the Eighth Air Force in Britain. His own replacement, Brigadier General Newton Longfellow, was charged with reviewing the losses being incurred by the air force, and found at Thurleigh, a lack of discipline and poor leadership.

Even though Col. Overcracker, the Commander in charge at Thurleigh, was a well liked commander by his men, there were concerns from those above that he was overly caring for his crews to the point that they were able to ‘get around’ him far too easily. This, Newton thought, was the reason why so many aircraft and crews from the Group had been lost in those early months of their war.

Newton consulted with Eaker who called upon Col. Frank Armstrong, one of the six original staff members at the inception of the 8th AF, to go to Thurleigh and make amends. This he did. he ruled the men with a tight and hard discipline turning the Bomb Group’s fortunes around, a move that was later recalled in the novel and film “Twelve o’clock High” written by one of Eaker’s other original six staff members, Cap. Beirne Lay Jr. along with Maj. Sy Bartlett one of Spaatz’s staff officers.

Armstrong would take over the 306th for a month and a half. Being assigned to the Group on 2nd January 1943. During that time, he would make dramatic changes to both the structure and the outcomes of the Group.

Baptism by Fire: Losses Continue Despite Command Changes

But change came slowly. Even as Armstrong took over, the 306th continued to lose aircraft and crews. On January 3rd, seventy-two B-17s and thirteen B-24s from the 44th, 91st, 303rd, 305th and 306th Bomb Groups were sent back to bomb the U-boat pens at St. Nazaire. After all seven of the 306th aircraft bombed the target they headed for home. The Journey in however, had been hell for the crews as flak had been both heavy, thick and accurate, with many aircraft from all groups sustaining damage.

One 306th aircraft, B-17F – #41-24470, “Sons Of Fury” had been so badly damaged that two engines were out of action and the nose with both the navigator and bombardier inside, was blown off. Separated from the rest of the formation, it was soon picked up over the sea by FW-190s and attacked yet again. Slowly losing height, it would eventually ditch in the cold waters of the Bay of Biscay. But even as it did so, the top turret continued to fire at the passing 190s, who continued to strafe the aircraft and crewmen who were now in the water, even though it was down and sinking. The heroic actions of the gunner in the turret, T/Sgt. Arizona Harris, were witnessed by a tail gunner in another 306th aircraft, who described how Harris continued to fire his weapons even as the water filled his turret until eventually, the firing stopped. His actions that day led to him receiving a DSC posthumously.

From page 50 of the wartime British Edition of “Target Germany” – 1944. The text relates what a 369th BS officer witnessed on the 3 January 1943 mission to Saint-Nazaire, when B-17 # 41-24470 went down. (IWM UPL 44487)

Meanwhile at Thurleigh, the first of Armstrong’s many changes were implemented starting with Colonel Overcracker, who on the 4th, was relieved from the organisation and posted to Headquarters. Three days later Major Coleman was relieved from his duties as Group Adjutant and reappointed as Group Executive Officer, his vacant position position being taken over by Captain Charles Day Jr.

To bolster the falling crew numbers, new crews were brought in, all arriving between the 14th and the 16th January, a move that coincided with seventeen aircraft attacking the locomotive and engineering works at Lille. Led by Major Wilson, the successful attack was marred by the tragic collision between #41-24471 “Four of a Kind” piloted by 1st Lt. Frank Jacknick and another B-17 #41-24498 piloted by 2nd Lt. Wallace Kirkpatrick, both of the 369th BS. *10, There were few survivors from the crash and those that did were taken prisoner by the Germans.

A report by a following crew*11 highlighted how Kirkpatrick’s aircraft was thought to have lost sight of the lead plane as they turned into the sun. The lead plane being unaware, carried on in a straight line. Kirkpatrick’s aircraft then crossed the lead plane at about 30o catching the tail fin with his propellers. The lead ship looped as a result breaking in half as the propellers from the second ship tore through its fuselage sending the aircraft toward the ground, such were the perils of formation flying in a war zone.

Concrete Cracks and Operational Strains

The continued onslaught against Germany led to further issues at Thurleigh airfield. A common problem on some airfields was that the weight of the heavy bombers was too much for the thin concrete tracks, and soon the substrate of both the perimeters and the runways began to fall apart.  At Thurleigh, this caused numerous difficulties whilst taxiing and taking off, with tyres being repeatedly blown or damaged. The problem became so severe that engineers had to be brought in quickly and essential repairs made. *12*13

The swiftness of the early changes made by General Armstrong continued on with postings and further changes of role. On the 18th January, Major Putnam was assigned as the 306th Group Operations Officer, followed by on the next day, Major Landford who was relieved of command of the 368th and reassigned to the 11th CCRC. His departure was met with sadness from the crews as he had led them from the start and was liked by the crews. The 20th then saw Capt. Mack Mckay reassigned from the 423rd to the 368th; he would be promoted to Major at the end of February only to be relieved from his assignment and duty in early April.

A Turning Point: The 306th Strikes Back

The 23rd January was then marked by two major events. Firstly, Lt. Col. Delmer Wilson was released from his post and reassigned to the 1st Combat Wing, and secondly, seventeen aircraft of the 423rd took off on a return visit to the U-Boat base at St. Lorient – an operation that had previously caused huge problems for the Group. Led by Major Wilson of the 423rd, the attack was, this time,  successful and there were no loss of aircraft, even the bombing which devastated the German barracks, was accurate.

After almost four months of operations, the icing was finally put on the cake for the 306th when the Eighth Air Force made its first venture into Germany, and Wilhelmshaven. On 27th January, 1943, Colonel Armstrong (who had led the Eighth’s first mission with pilot Major Paul Tibbets of ‘Enola Gay’ fame) and Major Putnam, led the 306th’s formation in a 367th BS aircraft. Following along in the formation were three other B-17 Groups and two B-24 Groups, it was a mighty armada heading into German airspace. General Eaker had decided that Armstrong, and the newly reformed 306th, deserved the honour of being ‘first over Germany’ after their incredible turn round in operational achievements.

Bombing through breaks in the cloud, the formation experienced only moderate flak and few enemy fighters, the Germans being caught ‘off guard’ for once. Once again, all the 306th aircraft returned home safely, greeted by a “crowd of beaming Generals and inquisitive reporters“. Of the ninety-one aircraft dispatched in total, only three were lost, none from the 306th. To top it all, at the end of that month the 306th were further rewarded with General Armstrong receiving an Air Medal, twelve crewmen receiving Purple Hearts, and a number of others receiving other awards including three Oak Leaf Clusters.

Armstrong’s strong leadership was now paying off and results were being seen from the Thurleigh group. A bad start had led to an almost perfect six mission period for the 369th BS, with no aircraft or crewman being listed as ‘missing in action’. A remarkable record considering how fierce the spring of 1943 had been.

Leadership Legacy: Armstrong’s Departure and Recognition at Vegesack

In February, Colonel Armstrong Jr. was promoted to Brigadier General, his reign at Thurleigh then came to and end – a month and a half after he had arrived. His place as Commanding Officer was then filled by the also recently promoted, Lt. Colonel Putnam.

One issue that had come to the front during this short period, was the lack of electrically heated suits for the gunners who were now suffering from serious bouts of frostbite. A shortage of navigators and bombardiers due to illness or injury was also now starting to cause problems, and requests were put in for more of each to cover those incapacitated through various health issues.

Despite this, bombing accuracy was much improved. Mechanical issues were far less frequent and more aircraft were reaching their targets than before. In mid March this improvement was recognised following an attack on the submarine works at Veggesack, when Major Wilson led twenty aircraft of the 306th BG into both heavy and accurate flak and intense fighter opposition.

When all aircraft returned the results were commended and applauded by the Prime Minister, the Marshall of the RAF, the Secretary of State for Air, the Commanding General of the USAAF, the Chief of Air Staff RAF, and the Commander in Chief Bomber Command. In response, Major General Ira Eaker wrote “To my mind the Vegesack raid  is the climax; it concludes the experiment. There should no longer be the slightest vestige of doubt that our heavy bombers, with their trained crews, can overcome any enemy opposition and destroy their targets“. *14

Two days later, Lt. General Frank Andrews accompanied several generals including Eaker on a visit to Thurleigh for an inspection of the station. A group dance was held afterwards in “B” mess which continued on well into the early hours of the next morning. The month concluded with a range of congratulatory messages of praise, it would seem the 306th were now leading the way for the Eighth Air force and their fight against Nazi Germany.

By now airmen were mounting up their operational flights, getting nearer to that magical twenty-five operations. At Thurleigh, another ‘first’ would be achieved when Technical Sgt Michael Roskovitch achieved that golden figure in April 1943.

First to Twenty-Five: Sgt Roskovitch’s Milestone

Roskovich, from Pennsylvania – known as “The Mad Russian” because of his distinctive looks and matching personality – was the son of a Russian immigrant and was posted directly to the 306th BG at Thurleigh and assigned to the 423rd BS.

He achieved his ticket home on April 5th;  not only was it his first tour of duty ,but the first of any 8th Air Force airmen, a significant milestone in the organisation’s history, However, instead of going home as he was entitled to do, Roskovich opted to continue on with further operations extending his service record even further. He was promoted to the rank of 2nd Lt. as a Gunnery Officer going on to complete a further eight missions before losing his life.

On 4th February the following year (1944) he was part of a crew in B-17 #42-31715 on a training flight to RAF Drem in East Lothian, Scotland. On take off from Drem, the aircraft, with four crew and two British passengers on board, suffered an engine failure in the number 1 engine. With little time to think, the pilot opted to continue the take off on three, which proved to be a disaster as the aircraft failed to gain height and crashed into a field just beyond the airfield boundary. All those on board were killed that day including Michael Roskovich.

Technical Sgt Michael Roskovitch (sitting left) of the 423rd BS, 306th BG, who achieved 25 missions on April 5th 1943, the first American to do so. (IWM UPL 20320)

Roskovitch’s remarkable April achievement was followed up the very next day by Lt. James Pollock, also of the 423rd BS, who became the first Officer to achieve his twenty-five missions. With a third that month, the magical twenty-five was indeed achievable and many more airmen in the 306th were also closing in on that coveted title.

These three landmark achievements that April were however, to be overshadowed by what was perhaps the pinnacle of disasters for the 306th. On the 17th, no less than ten aircraft were lost on one single mission.

A Day of Tragedy: The Bremen Raid, 17 April 1943

According to the mission report*15, it was a maximum effort operation with the 306th sending out twenty-six aircraft at 09:45 to attack the Focke-Wulf plant at Bremen. The troubles started some fifty miles out when one aircraft had to return due to an oxygen failure. A second then turned back with one engine out and a further causing problems. On approach to the target the weather was clear and visibility good, allowing the 50 – 100 reported enemy fighters to clearly see the formation and pick out their targets. A mix of Me 109s and FW 190s swarmed the Americans in a determined and aggressive frontal attack, stragglers being picked off by a mix of Me 110s,  Me 210s and JU 88s bearing various markings. In an attempt to split the formation, a new type of weapon was used, ‘aerial bombs’ dropped from above the formation to explode in amongst the bombers. The shrapnel from exploding bombs simply adding to the incredible amount of explosives already facing the bomber crews on their long and what must have seemed slow progress to the target.

The attacks started long before the target was reached with two aircraft from the 306th going down. Approaching the city, the bombers faced flak that was both intense and accurate, many having to perform violent evasive moves to avoid being hit. Those inside the fragile B-17s being thrown about the fuselage like rag dolls. Crews reported that the resultant smoke was so intense that they couldn’t see where they were going and had to fly using their instruments instead of visually.

Once the bomb run was completed and all bombs dropped, the attackers returned and a further six bombers were seen to go down. Another two were also lost but in the chaos and mayhem that ensued, it was difficult for crews to establish just when that was. Numerous parachutes were seen, and it was too many to suggest there weren’t high casualties.

Despite all this, bombing was reported as ‘good’ with several principle buildings being set alight. Unfortunately though, no photographs were taken as the cameras were located on those aircraft that went down; of the remining ones they simply failed to function.

Of those aircraft that did return, two were so severely damaged that repairs took a further three weeks to complete. Another three were out of action for almost a week and a sixth landed away at RAF Coltishall its damage at the time unknown. The mission had been a slaughter.

Summer Challenges: The Epic ‘La Mesa Lass’

The early summer of 1943 saw extensive use of these new weapons to break up  the bomber formations. Stragglers and lone aircraft being far easier to attack and bring down that those offered the protection and security of a tight formation. Not wanting to forgo this protection, the B-17s were determined to remain together as long as they could. Rockets and aerial bombing by the Luftwaffe simply made this more challenging.

It wasn’t all one sided though. For on May 21st twenty-one aircraft were dispatched to Wilelmshaven as part of a much larger force of heavy bombers. During the attack the determination of the air-gunners paid off, with one B-17 crew, that of #42-29666 (La Mesa Lass) being credited with the shooting down  of eleven enemy aircraft, a record for the European Theatre.

The journey home for Lt. Robert Smith and his crew in ‘La Mesa Lass’ was one of great courage and determination. Over the target the aircraft was hit by flak knocking out two of the four engines. From there, until they were over the sea, they were relentlessly attacked by enemy fighters, as many as five at any one time, eventually losing a third engine. Now with little power and ‘down on the deck’ with fires repeatedly starting, all guns but the top turret ran out of ammunition. Shadowed by a Ju 88 waiting for the ‘kill’ co-pilot Lt. Robert McCallum climbed into the vacated turret and took aim. Giving a long burst, he became the only co-pilot in the Eighth Air Force to shoot down an enemy fighter.

Now barely flying, ‘La Mesa Lass’ was forced to ditch in the sea. The crew’s continued determination to ‘get home’ finally came to an end, and after a controlled ditching, all the crew managed to escape and climb into the dinghies where they remained for almost thirty hours before being picked up by the Royal Navy the following day.

Farewell Flight: The Death of Captain Raymond Check

On June 26th, 1943 Captain Raymond Check departed Thurleigh in ‘Chennault’s Pappy III‘ on what should have been an easy run – a milk run – to attack the German airfield in Tricqueville, France. As a farewell, Check’s old friend and commander, Lt. James Wilson, flew as pilot and the pilot, Lt. William Cassidy flew as waist gunner. Check sat in the co-pilot’s seat, his usual position in the aircraft.

Just seconds before bomb release, a canon shell ripped through the cockpit striking Check in the neck where it exploded decapitating him. A fire started in the cabin which Wilson tried putting out with his bare hands having removed his gloves just seconds earlier. With Oxygen now pouring into the cockpit it  quickly became an inferno. Wilson with little usable flesh beneath his elbow and in excruciating pain, tried to control the aircraft with what was left of his limb, all the time a further crewman tried to extinguish the fire with a small fire extinguisher. With his face and hands so badly burnt there was little skin left, Wilson fought on, when suddenly another shell struck the flares igniting them, setting off another fierce fire in the same confined space.

Cassidy, on hearing the alarm bell, made his way to the cockpit to be greeted by the most horrific sight imaginable. He tried to administer morphine to Wilson before passing him to a passenger medic on board who had joined them for ‘experience’.

Cassidy sat in the pilots seat next to the decapitated body of his co-pilot trying to avoid looking at him. With help from the navigator, Lt. Milton Blanchette – also on his 25th mission – he brought the badly damaged ship home to Thurleigh landing from the downwind direction so as to avoid Check’s waiting girlfriend and wife to be, a nurse, and the welcoming group setting up a party for Check.

In a matter of moments, what should have been a gloriously happy day turned to the most gruesome of events that would no doubt affect the lives of so many people for evermore.

Captain Raymond J. Check 423rd BS, 306th BG, killed June 26, 1943 on his 25th mission (IWM UPL 26584)

Visitors in the Wake of Tragedy; but The Cracks are Showing

The following day, a pre arranged visit occurred in which the British Foreign Secretary Anthony Eden; Lt. Gen. Jacob Devers (ETO Commander); Maj. Gen. Ira Eaker (USAAF Commander); Brig. Gen. Lonfellow and Brig. Gen. Armstrong were all given a tour of the airfield. Following such a dramatic event, the visit probably did little to lighten the mood at Thurleigh that particular afternoon.

Thurleigh’s transformation into a USAAF base began in 1942 bringing the 306th Bomb Group across the Atlantic, the first American unit to take the fight to occupied Europe from British soil. Their welcome was far from easy – mud, unfinished huts, and constant shortages made daily life tough, while their earliest missions were plagued by heavy losses and accidents. Captain Paul Adams’s aircraft was lost over Lille, Captain Raymond Check was brutally killed on his last mission and others returned shot full of holes. Yet through adversity, and a complete change in command, the Group hardened quickly, adapting tactics and strengthening their Flying Fortresses. By year’s end, the men of the 306th were tested, blooded, and ready for more.

The entire history can be read in Trail 65.

Trail 65 – RAF Thurleigh Part 2 – The USAAF Arrive.

In Part 1 we saw how RAF Thurleigh emerged from the Bedfordshire countryside and was shaped by early Luftwaffe raids on the construction site. We saw the arrival of new RAF training units flying Wellington bombers, and their subsequent departure to the far East. We saw how tragedy and fatal accidents claimed the lives of new Polish crews training at the station with 18 OTU, and how with Bomber Command moving on, Thurleigh’s role was set to change dramatically.

A New Ally Arrives: The American Transformation of Thurleigh

At the end of 1941, after the surprise attack on Pearl Harbour, America entered the conflict declaring war on both Japan and Germany and their allies. Over the next few months high ranking officials hurriedly put plans in place to send twenty-eight American bomb groups to the United Kingdom, and the European theatre of war. In a meeting between General Eaker and Air Chief Marshal Arthur Harris, discussions took place that would not only facilitate such a move, but also give the Americans suitable airfields on which to house their new heavy bombers.

Aware that most British airfields were too small to accommodate the American’s heavy bomber units, Eaker went on to press Harris for specific details including both their locations and the facilities available at each one. Anticipating this, Harris handed over the identity of eight potential sites, many of them RAF satellite stations, but all suitable for the American’s use. Amongst these were the airfields at Polebrook, Chelveston, Molesworth, Kimbolton, and of course Thurleigh.

Initially designated Station B-4, Thurleigh would then undergo a major modification programme, one that would bring it up to the new Class ‘A’ standard, a specification that would make it suitable for the American heavy bombers, both the B-24 ‘Liberator’ and the B-17 ‘Flying Fortresses’ that Eaker was sending over.

Thurleigh

One of the former arms buildings.

Construction crews quickly began work, both extending and reinforcing the short runways; they added additional hardstands, and expanded both the technical and domestic sites. Upon completion, the airfield would feature three concrete runways: one of 2,000 feet and two of 1,400 feet in length, each being the standard 50 yards wide. Aircraft dispersal was facilitated by a total of 51 loop and frying-pan style hardstands arranged around a full length perimeter track.

In addition, and unusually, four T2 hangars were erected, providing protective aircraft shelter and maintenance facilities. The bomb store was discreetly placed in Galsey Wood, a wooded area to the northwest and away from the main flying and accommodation areas – an essential safety precaution in wartime.

Fifteen accommodation sites, including two communal areas, two WAAF quarters, medical facilities, and barrack blocks, were all established along the road leading away from Thurleigh village to the south-west of the airfield. These sites employed a variety of wartime construction styles – brick, timber, concrete, steel, asbestos, and plasterboard – using standard designs from Laing, Nissen, Seco, Jane, Romney, and others. At full capacity, the base would accommodate over 440 officers and more than 2,500 enlisted personnel, including members of the Women’s Auxiliary Air Force.

After being allocated to the Americans on August 10th 1942, Thurleigh opened with its first residents. On 7th September that year, the first and only front line bomber Group to operate from the airfield, the 306th Bomb Group (BG), arrived with its four squadrons of B-17s: the 367th, 368th, 369th and 423rd Bomb Squadrons (BS). In command would be Col. Charles B. “Chip” Overcracker.

The 306th Bomb Group: Arrival of “The Reich Wreckers” (Autumn 1942)

Known as “The Reich Wreckers” the 306th would have many claims to fame, including being the oldest operational Bomb Group in the 8th Air Force and the only one to remain at the same station (Thurleigh) in England for the longest period of time. In addition, they were the first unit to have personnel achieve their first tour of operations, a major mile stone that gave the whole air force hope that going home was indeed possible.

Thurleigh

A graffiti panel rescued from a 423rd BS barrack now on display at the museum.

The Group, designated the 306th, were constituted on January 28th 1942, and activated in March that same year. Their journey to the UK began at Gowen Field in Idaho, transferring through Wendover Field to their embarkation point at New York onboard HMS Queen Elizabeth. The ground echelon set sale, travelling across the treacherous north Atlantic route to arrive at Greenock in Scotland, on September 5th, 1942.

The air echelon travelled separately, arriving a week later in small groups touching down at Thurleigh between the 8th and 13th September, having flown their own thirty-five aircraft across the northern route. This cold and bleak route took them via Greenland and Iceland, before passing over northern Ireland to arrive at Prestwick in Scotland on the north-west coast. During the journey over, one B-17F, with a crew of nine and one passenger, exploded for no apparent reason, 150 miles from Gander Lake,  Newfoundland. A second aircraft also ditched in the Irish Sea. The crew in this instance were picked up, but the aircraft was lost in the cold waters of the North Atlantic. This was the third B-17 the group had lost since their inauguration.

The 306th would go on to fight in some of the most bitter air battles of the war, including Schweinfurt, Stuttgart, Hannover, Berlin, Ludwigshafen and Leipzig. They would lead the first US bomber penetration of German skies; Big Week in February 1944, and go on to support both the Normandy landings and the St. Lo breakout. They would remain active throughout the war achieving numerous awards including two Medals of Honour, numerous Purple Hearts and two Distinguished Unit Citations (DUC) for action over occupied Europe.

Their arrival at Thurleigh was not however the great dream they may have wished for. On unloading, the 306th were greeted by unfinished buildings and mud – lots of it. Tents immediately formed the basis of personnel  accommodation and the officers’ mess was so small, staff had to operate in three shifts to enable them all to get fed.

Not only was a considerable amount of work needing to be done to get the station ready, but being new to the European theatre, a huge amount of ‘up-skilling’ was also going to be needed. To this end, intelligence staff, operations controllers and flight controllers were all sent to RAF stations to learn the ‘tricks of the trade’ enabling them to operate alongside their British counterparts in what was about to become a very busy airspace.

Baptism by Fire: First Operations and Early Losses

This poor start was then compounded when on October 2nd 1942, during a practice mission over the Wash, one of the waist gunners of B-17 #41-24492 ‘Lady Halitosis‘ of the 367th BS, suffered oxygen failure. In a bid to help the gunner, the pilot put the aircraft into a steep dive losing some 9,000 feet of altitude in a matter of minutes. The dive and subsequent recovery was so severe that the aircraft’s control cables snapped, and part of the starboard wing broke away taking an engine with it. The aircraft then caught fire and the bomb bay doors became detached. One of these doors, struck the rear section of the aircraft with such force that it severed the fuselage at the tail. The rear gunner, trapped inside his position, desperately tried to escape, hammering at the plexiglass and fuselage to break out. With only a 1,000 feet of air left, he just managed to break through the fuselage and free himself from his falling coffin. His parachute luckily opened, and he landed safely some distance away south-east of Spalding in Lincolnshire. His luck, already used exhaustively, somehow managed to continue on for a few moments more, when the remainder of the burning  B-17 came crashing down a mere one hundred yards or so from where he was sat.

Rescue crews from a nearby anti-aircraft gun ran to the scene but they were unable to get close enough to the wreckage due the the ferocity of the fire, and sadly, all six of those left inside, perished. During the whole episode only one other crewman managed to escape – Ball Turret Gunner Private Raymond McAskill – suffering slight injuries as he did so.

The event was so understandably harrowing for gunner S.Sgt. William Kellum, that he was eventually grounded, his mental state rendering him ‘unfit’ to continue on after having only carried out a few missions following his horrific flight debut in England.

With this disaster behind them, the 306th took to the air once more on their maiden operation on October 9th 1942, an operation to bomb the steel works at Lille, France. But again, it was not to be the glorious outcome they all would have wished for.

For the first time, over 100 American bombers, a mix of B-24s and B-17s, led by the soon to be legendary Col. Edward “Ted” Timberlake, flew across the English Channel to France. The huge formation, escorted by over 400 fighters, a mix of Spitfires – now part of the 4th Fighter Group –  and P-38 “Lightnings”, knew how important this mission was going to be.

Waiting for them were the battle hardened Luftwaffe pilots of JG 26 in their FW190s, they were not going to let the bombers through easily and the sky would be full.

With departure planned for 08:32, the lumbering giants gradually rose in to the air and set route for France.

As the bombers reached the target, the Luftwaffe struck, focussing initially on the B-24s of 93rd BG. Attacking from their favoured position, the rear, they struck at the formation ignoring the fighters flying high above. Releasing over the target, bombing was considered poor, some bomb aimers not even finding the target and so dropping their bombs on alternative sites. During the action, the formation had become disjointed, partly due to some turning back with technical problems and partly to some being knocked out by enemy fighters – the defensive wall had been breached.

As for the 306th, a second aircraft was lost, and this time there were no survivors. A third B-17, #41-24486 “Man O’ War” piloted by 2nd. Lt. James M. Stewart, lost three engines and its radio failed. It was about to ditch in the English Channel, when – as if out of a boy’s action story – a Spitfire, flown by Flt. Lt. Andrews of 91 Sqn, appeared alongside and guided the B-17 to RAF Manston in Kent where it made a successful crash landing. None of the crew were injured in the event, saved no doubt by the actions of Flt. Lt. Andrews.

Inexperience played a large part for many of the crews taking part that day. Being new to operational duties, not only had they suffered poor aiming but gunners had made hugely exaggerated claims about the numbers of enemy aircraft shot down – although probably unknowingly to them. In reply to the frenzied attack on the formation, air gunners sprayed bullets all over the sky hitting everything except the enemy. A mix of poor training and a determination to prove their worth, had been a recipe for disaster.

Thurleigh

One of several buildings on the bomb store.

Not only was the bomb aiming poor but so was the navigation. Many navigators, like the gunners, were simply not experienced enough, nor trained well enough for the European geography. With thick cloud being present almost all of the time, many new crews were unable to identify specific geographical features and were simply lost within 10 minutes of leaving their home base.*4

During this initial operation experienced enemy fighters were both fearsome and determined in their attacks. Whilst few bombers were actually shot down, all of those in the lagging 306th received hits from the FW-190s – some severely. The opening few weeks had been a real eye opener for the 306th, an experience resembling a baptism of fire not only for those newbies the “The Reich Wreckers“, but for the Eighth Air Force as a whole.

Weather, Warnings, and Misfires: October’s Frustrating Missions

The British winter weather then intervened. Several operations were cancelled as were training flights which were greatly needed. A cancelled flight to Lorient on October 21st, merely two weeks after their first operation, meant that the entire 306th returned without dropping a single bomb. The declining weather and poor visibility was to blame, but some ninety aircraft did continue on, and of those who did bomb, their bombs simply “bounced off” the submarine pens, having no impact whatsoever. *5

Aircrews were learning that operations over enemy territory were high risk, but even scrubbed missions could have their problems: aircraft still had tanks full of petrol and bomb-bays were still filled with tons of high explosives. For the 306th, troubles on this mission began even before they had left British airspace. When the abort signal came through, it instructed crews to drop their ordnance in the Wash – a large body of shallow coastal water off the north Norfolk coast.  Whilst it became a common practice for scrubbed missions, for one B-17 it was not going to be a simple or straight forward task.

Emergency Landing: A B-17 Touches Down at Sutton Bridge

B-17F, #41-24460 ‘RD-A’, “Little Audrey” of the 423 BS, began the process of releasing its bombs when suddenly the life raft latch broke loose causing the raft to escape and wrap itself around the elevator rendering the aircraft difficult to control.

Captain Mack McKay, 306th BG points to a “kill” marking painted on his B-17 Flying Fortress “Little Audrey” (IWM FRE 4418)

Now being unstable in flight, the B-17 had to find a safe place to land, and near to the Wash was the firing range at Holbeach and its associated airfield at RAF Sutton Bridge. A physically small grass airfield that was used for gunnery training of RAF fighters, it was not designed to take large four-engined heavy bombers. The likely hood of getting down safely was slim, but after using all his skill and judgement, the pilot managed to put the bomber down safely on the grass much to the joy of those inside the bomber. Once remedial work had been carried out on the aircraft, the crew began to prepare for the take off, an event just as risky as the landing and with odds just as bad.

Being an unusual aircraft to see at Sutton Bridge, huge crowds gathered to see the B-17 and to witness what could have been a terrible accident had the take off been misjudged on the small grass strip. Fortunately though, again using all his skill and judgement, the pilot got the aircraft up and the B-17 successfully rose in to the air making its way home to Thurleigh being waved off by the extensive crowd of locals gathered by. *6

Mounting Pressure: Heavy Losses and Royal Visits

The early days of November 1942, saw missions 3, 4 and 5 for the 306th. Visits to Brest, Lille and St. Nazaire, saw a further four aircraft lost with all crews listed as ‘missing in action’. These early loses were beginning to mount, and those in charge were beginning to voice their concerns.

On November 13th, a Royal visit was made in which General Carl Spaatz and King George VI carried out a tour of the many airfields now in the region, including Thurleigh. Whilst the Royal party were here, they were shown around the airfield, seeing the various facilities available. They were also introduced to several crews and ground staff with whom they chatted happily.

Brigadier-General Newton Longfellow and Lieutenant Robert L Riordan of the 306th Bomb Group, show King George VI part of a damaged B-17 Flying Fortress during a royal visit. (IWM FRE 4390)

The B-17’s Fatal Flaw – and its Remedy

But the relief brought by important visitors didn’t prevent problems in the air. By now, the Luftwaffe had got the measure the of the B-17 and pilots, such as Oberstleutant Egon Mayer, quickly found its Achilles heel. Even though bristling with guns, the B-17s suffered from ‘blind spots’, areas where the gun’s arc didn’t cover. This made the bomber vulnerable, and the worst position was through a direct full frontal attack. New tactics were then used by the Luftwaffe, directing fire directly at the front of the aircraft, potentially its most vulnerable position. It became so successful, that some 30% of pilots and co-pilots in the 306th were killed in such attacks.*7  With little protection, early model B-17Es were quickly withdrawn from front line operations and investigations carried out into a possible remedy to the problem.*8

Naturally the B-17 crews realised this vulnerability too, and also set about finding their own remedy. Whilst official routes were being taken to solve the problem, these were taking too long, and a quicker solution was needed. Within the 367th BS an armourer  and a welder (S. Sgts. James C. Green and Ben F. Marcilonis) got together and took matters into their own hands. They designed and built a new bracket that could hold a heavy .50 machine gun fitted into the nose of the aircraft to protect this gap in the forward arc.  Once constructed and fitted, trials began, the ‘guinea pig’ being a B-17F #42-5130 named “Sweet Pea“.

The bracket fitted to Sweet Pea, proved to be so successful that it was adopted not only by the 306th but the 8th Air Service Command as a whole*9 becoming part of a modification feature to future B-17 models.

The aircraft  was unusual for other reasons though. It was ‘christened’ on December 20th 1942, by a small orphan girl called ‘Maureen’ whom the 367th BS had adopted from a London orphanage. They gave her the nickname ‘Sweet Pea‘ and to mark the occasion, she dipped her hand in paint and placed a print on the aircraft as a form of dedication.. Like many aircraft of the ‘Reich Wreckers’, Sweet Pea would fly on several operations, suffering a great deal of damage in the process; eventually failing to return from operations to Lorient on March 6th 1943, with one airman killed in action, one evading and eight being taken prisoners of war.

The news report on the dedication of ‘Sweet Pea‘ by Maureen – a three year-old orphan – at Thurleigh. (IWM UPL 15963)

Thurleigh had transformed from a training airfield into a heavy bomber base ready for its new American role. Upgraded to Class “A” standard it soon became home to the 306th Bomb Group – “The Reich Wreckers.” Their arrival in September 1942 was far from smooth though: unfinished buildings, muddy conditions, and a steep learning curve in the European theatre made for a difficult start. Early missions brought tragedy, from training accidents to heavy combat losses, while poor weather and inexperience compounded their struggles. Yet alongside setbacks came resilience, adaptation, and even innovation, as crews refined tactics and strengthened their aircraft. With these foundations laid, the stage was set for the 306th to face the increasingly bitter air battles of 1943.

The entire history can be read in Trail 65

Trail 65 – RAF Thurleigh Part 1 – Its Birth.

In Trail 65 we head west again this time to the borders of Bedfordshire and Northampton, where a former wartime airfield evolved from a base for USAAF bombers into a centre of aviation excellence. First built during the Second World War, it supported critical missions over occupied Europe. In the post-war years, it transitioned into a leading site for aeronautical research, contributing to major advances in jet technology, carrier operations, and automated landing systems. Although official flying ended in 1994, the site continued to reflect a remarkable legacy, marking its place in history as a cornerstone of Britain’s military and civil aviation development.

In this trail, we go back to Bedfordshire and the former RAF Thurleigh.

RAF Thurleigh (Station 111)

Situated some 6.5 miles north of Bedford, RAF Thurleigh was built on land approximately 250 feet above sea level. Although not a high elevation, its open plateau setting – typical of many wartime airfields – exposed it to the elements. Surrounded by multiple river sources, the location benefited from good natural drainage, aiding its suitability as an airfield site.

The nearby village of Thurleigh has a long recorded history, appearing in the Domesday Book as La Lega*1 – a name that over centuries, has evolved into its current form. In a similar fashion, the airfield that bears the same name, would come to be known under many titles of its own: RAF Thurleigh, USAAF Station 111, RAE Bedford, Bedford Aerodrome, and Thurleigh Airfield Business Park amongst others. Yet throughout its history, one theme remained constant – aviation.

The War Reaches Bedfordshire: Early Bombings and Construction (1941)

Thurleigh’s association with the Second World War began even before construction commenced. Isolated bombing incidents in the parish during 1941 – possibly the result of jettisoned bombs from German aircraft – marked its early wartime experience. Once the airfield’s construction began however, it quickly caught the attention of the Luftwaffe. On 17th April that year, eight enemy bombs were dropped directly onto the construction site, causing damage to the incomplete runway. A second attack on 12th August 1941 saw another eight bombs fall along the northern boundary, again damaging the airfield and rupturing a water main*2. Both raids highlighted how conspicuous such developments were to enemy reconnaissance and subsequent aerial attacks.

Once land had been sourced, the airfield’s construction was carried out by the company W.C. French Ltd. and officially opened during the summer of 1941. At this early stage, Thurleigh was a modest airfield in size, suited only for fighters or light to medium bombers. Its first operational residents were the personnel from No. 18 Operational Training Unit (OTU), part of the RAF’s Bomber Command. Having recently adopted the twin-engined Vickers Wellington, 18 OTU (formed from the Polish Training Unit in No. 6 Group, in June 1940 to train light bomber crews for Polish operational squadrons) was tasked with preparing new crews transitioning onto bombers ready for active duty.

Though OTUs were primarily training units, they often found themselves involved in operational sorties, especially during periods of ‘maximum effort’. As a result, many crews suffered casualties, even before they joined a front-line operational squadron.

Following them, in October 1941, 12 Operational Training Unit – first formed at RAF Benson in April 1940 – briefly stayed here. Their residency lasting a mere month, it remains unclear whether it was the entire unit, or just detachments  that were present here during that time. It was also at this time that the first recorded aircraft landing took place at Thurleigh: Wellington IC R1234*3 touching down on the new runway, marking a small but important milestone in the station’s dramatic history.

12 OTU Were not the only training unit to reside here. The Central Gunnery School (CGS), famed for “training the trainers” remained here from December 1941 until their departure to RAF Sutton Bridge on the Lincolnshire / Norfolk border in April 1942.

First established at RAF Warmwell on 6th November 1939, the CGS would train both gunners of bombers and fighters in the art of aerial warfare, those attending having proven themselves in combat already. Once trained, they would return to their original squadrons and pass on their valuable knowledge to others.

Tropical Kit and Tragedy: The Brief Story of 160 Squadron (1942)

Thurleigh’s relative quiet made it an ideal location to raise a new unit, and on January 16th 1942, the ground echelon of 160 Squadron RAF, formed here. Created as a Consolidated B-24 Liberator unit under War Establishment order WAR/ME/448 (dated 31st December 1941), the squadron’s formation began with the arrival of 108 airmen, who were followed by a further 126 the very next day. Over the following weeks, the numbers of ground crew and support staff swelled, as it did, each one was issued with tropical kit, a move that suggested a deployment to the Far East.

Throughout the weeks that followed, the air echelon underwent heavy bomber training some with 1653 Heavy Conversion Unit at RAF Polebrook, while  other crew members were sent to RAF Upwood for additional preparation. In mid-February, the posting finally came through and the ground party departed enroute to the Far East. Meanwhile, the air crews transferred to RAF Lyneham in Wiltshire, where they collected their new B-24s before they too left for the Far east.

Tragedy and Transition – May 1942

The now quieter Thurleigh would then experience a series of tragic accidents. On 18th May 1942, Wellington IC DV783, flown by a Polish crew led by Pilot Officer J. Kilmcsyk, crashed shortly after taking off. Just moments after departing the runway, the aircraft suddenly, and without warning, dived into the ground; the ensuing fireball killing all five crew members onboard. The Wellington, along with the crew’s bodies, was later recovered and the airmen interned in the Polish War Graves section of Newark cemetery in Nottinghamshire.

This was the second fatal crash suffered by the unit in as many days, a tragedy that was compounded by another such incident the following day – although mercifully this time, there would be no fatalities.

Not long after this short but devastating period, 18 OTU departed Thurleigh, a move that signified the end of its ties, as a training airfield, with Bomber Command. For the remainder of the war,  there would be no further front line, RAF units assigned here, and attention now turned to its new owner, the United States Army Air Forces.

In Part 2, we continue our journey through Thurleigh’s wartime history. We see the arrival of the USAAF, and share their experiences both good and bad. We learn of the failures of the B-17 and how through innovation they overcome these problems becoming one of the most successful bomb groups of the war.

The full story of RAF Thurleigh can be. read in Trail 65.

The last flight of Joe Kennedy and Wilford Willy – (RAF Fersfield).

There has been much written about the young Kennedy, his life, his family and his death, but a lot of information around his death has remained ‘unknown’ for many years. Even today, the actual cause of his death is not clear and will probably remain so.

Joseph Kennedy Jnr was based at RAF Fersfield (originally RAF Winfarthing) in Norfolk (Trail 27), and had only been there a few weeks before he tragically died on August 12th 1944, whilst operating on secret operations. A tragic loss, this is the last flight of Joseph Kennedy and Wilford Willy from RAF Fersfield, Norfolk, England.

The Crew – Lieutenant Joseph Kennedy Jnr.

Joseph Kennedy was born July 25th 1915, Nantasket, Massachusetts, he was the eldest brother of eight siblings including John F. Kennedy. He was son to Joseph Patrick Kennedy and Rose Fitzgerald. Throughout his life he had been pressured into the political life by his father who had high hopes that his son would become the future President. Joseph Jnr wanted to please. As war loomed, Joe Kennedy Jnr rose to the challenge seizing his opportunity to become the ‘shining light’ of the Kennedy family.

The Kennedy parents instilled a desire to be competitive, to win and succeed and to be the best. This came out in Joseph during his time at both home and at school. The pressure on Joseph was enormous, and it was clearly evident throughout his short life.

Joseph lived in the shadow of his younger brother John, who would captain a PT boat in the Far East, and in Joseph’s absence, go on to become President of the most powerful nation on Earth. John was the brighter, the more determined of the two, and this caused friction between them. Joe always wanting to ‘out-do’ his brother persevered, but never seemed to quite make it.

It was this determination and rivalry that perhaps led Joseph to do what he did, to impress, to be the best and the ideal way he thought was as a war hero.

With a remarkable academic background behind him, Joseph Kennedy joined the U.S. Naval Reserves on October 15th 1941, reporting to the Naval Air Station (N.A.S.) at Jacksonville, Florida the following day. After several months of training he received his commission and on January 10th 1943 he joined a flying patrol squadron. In May he became a Junior Grade Lieutenant transferring to a bomber squadron in the following July that year. In 1944, on July 1st, he was promoted to Lieutenant United States Naval Reserve. His military life would last just over one month.

Joseph was posted to RAF Dunkeswell serving under the RAF’s Coastal Command. Flying a PB4Y he would carry out U-Boat searches over the Atlantic around the Bay of Biscay and the Atlantic. As he accumulated flying hours, he rarely came into any real danger, even when posted to cover the Allied invasion fleet over Normandy he rarely came into contact with any opposing aircraft or vessels.

Joseph Kennedy’s opportunity came when volunteers were asked for to undertake a special secret and dangerous operation. He jumped at the chance to be a hero.

Joseph Kennedy arrived at RAF Fersfield, Norfolk on 30th July 1944, where he was trained for two weeks.  On August 10th 1944, he wrote a letter home, it would be his last communication with his family. Joseph Kennedy was to become a pilot in operation Anvil, the Navy’s version of Aphrodite.

Lieutenant Wilford John Willy

Sadly, Lieutenant Wilford J. Willy (s/n: O-137078), has remained in the shadows probably because the status of Joseph Kennedy Jnr. A tragic loss nonetheless and no less an important one. Willy was born 13th May 1909, New Jersey. He enlisted in the Navy in 1928, gaining his Naval Wings on April 30th 1937, just two years after he had married his sweetheart, Edna C. Schaffery, the women he left behind. On advancing through the rank of Chief Petty Officer,  he was awarded Lower Grade Lieutenant (April 28th 1942) and two months later, on June 26th, he achieved the rank of Lieutenant. Willy served at a number of operational stations, including Pearl Harbour, before being posted to RAF Fersfield, in Norfolk.

Willy, now an expert in Radio Operations and procedures, became the Executive Officer of the Special Air Unit One (S.A.U.1), the rank he achieved when he took off with Kennedy on August 12th 1944.

Operations Anvil and Aphrodite.

Whilst Drone technology and research had been around as early as World War I, it was still relatively unchartered territory. However, radio controlled drones (modern name Unmanned Aerial Vehicles or U.A.V.s) were already being used with relative success for target practice by the RAF and USAAF during World War II. The ‘Queen Bee’ being one of many used by the RAF. The Germans had also been investigating drone and guided bomb use through examples such as the Mistel aircraft (the most successful being a combination of either a FW-190 or Me-109 mounted above a Ju 88).

Both the  USAAF and USN were undertaking secret trials into drone aircraft operations with the view of attacking the heavily defended and ‘impenetrable’ submarine and ‘V’ weapons sites across northern France . The aim, to stop, or at least reduce, the Nazi’s use of the V1, V2 rockets and the development of the new V3 canon.

Codenamed ‘Aphrodite‘ by the USAAF,  and ‘Anvil‘  by the Navy, they were two secret operations running side by side. The idea behind these operations, was to remove all excess equipment from war-weary B-17s and B-24s, fill them with explosives, such as the British Torpex, put in radio receivers so that the drone (baby) could be controlled by a separate aircraft (mother) and fly them into designated targets. A volunteer crew of two would take off, set the aircraft in flight and then bail out over the U.K. or English Channel, leaving the ‘baby’ in the control of the ‘mother’ aircraft. These would then fly, by remote control, to the target when they would be put into a dive destroying whatever they hit.

The controls of the B-17 . The arm linkage moved the control column in response to the radio controls. (credit USAF)

The idea was remarkable but not new, and the equipment whilst innovative for its day, was basic to say the least. In all the operations undertaken only one drone ever reached its target, and that was through more luck than skill.

‘Azon’ (from AZimuth ONly*1) controls had been used successfully on individual 500lb or 1000lb bombs, where the control box was attached to the rear of the bomb and controlled by the bomb aimer through a joy stick. Using two directional controls (left or right) he could direct a bomb very accurately onto a given point. The downside of Azon, was that range and fall had to be determined in the usual way by the bomb aimer, and could not be altered once the bomb had left the aircraft.

Azon had been used and proven in attacking bridges, railways and other longitudinal targets and was very accurate with a good bomb aimer. However, because of its limitations, it could only be used in one dimension and therefore was not capable a making a ‘baby’ take off.

Two aircraft types were identified for the project. Boeing’s B-17 ‘Flying Fortress’ and Consolidated’s B-24 ‘Liberator’. These once converted would be given new identifications BQ-7 (usually B-17Fs) and BQ-8 (B-24D/J). In each case it was deemed that two crew members would be needed to raise the ‘baby’ off the ground, partly because of the strength needed to pull back the control columns in these heavy bombers. Once airborne, they would climb to around 20,000ft, arm the Torpex, set the aircraft on a trajectory to the target, switch on the receivers and bail out.

About twenty-five  BQ-7s were modified, but it is not known accurately how many USAAF BQ-8s were converted. However, it is known that at least two naval PB4Y-1s (the naval version of the B-24 of which 400 had been converted from B-24 status – these were given s/n 31936 – 32335) were converted to BQ-8 standard; one of which was flown by Lt. Kennedy and  Lt. Willy on the 12th August 1944.

A number of support aircraft were needed for each mission. Prior to the attack a Mosquito XVI of the 653rd BS would photograph the target. Then the ‘baby’ would be accompanied by at least one fighter (either P-38 or P-51) incase the ‘baby’ lost control and had to be shot down, and for fighter escort; a ‘mother’ either a Lockheed Ventura or another B-17 modified to CQ-4 standard, and a photographic  Mosquito from the 8th Combat Camera Unit (CCU) to record in-flight behaviour. A post mission photo reconnaissance operation was carried out by the 25th BG at Watton to analyse the effectiveness of the bombing. It therefore took a lot of fuel, crew and aircraft to fly one drone to its target.

Because of the design features of the bombers, the USAAF looked into removing the cockpit to allow easy departure. The only aircraft that received this treatment was B-17F, “Olin’s 69’ERS” 42-30595 formally of 560BS, 388BG at Knettishall. It was never used on an Aphrodite mission  and was scrapped post war after being used for training in the open cockpit mode.  The BQ-8  (B-24) also had modifications made in the form of a widened hatch in the nose allowing for an easier escape from the aircraft. Once modified, the aircraft would have had all previous markings removed, and a special white or yellow paintwork applied to identify them from other bombers in the air. To assist the controllers in sighting the ‘babies’ whilst in flight, the aircraft were fitted with a smoke canister that would be ignited allowing the bomb aimer to see the aircraft as it began its dive. In addition to this, two cameras were fitted to some ‘babies’ that transmitted pictures to the mother or support ship. These pointed at the controls through the plexiglass, a revolutionary step forward in drone technology.

USAF designation system

A modified B-17 (BQ-7) with its canopy removed, this aircraft became a training drone. (Credit USAF)

In all, there were fifteen missions undertaken by the USAAF and USN, but none were to successfully hit their targets.  These included: Mimoyecques (Fortress); Siracourt (V1 Bunker); Watten (V2 Bunker); Heligoland (U-boat pens); Heide; Le Havre (docks); Hemmingstedt (oil refinery); Herford (marshalling yard) and Oldenburg (Power station). Both the operations and entire programme were cancelled only a few months after the Kennedy/Willy mission.

The last flight.

At RAF Fersfield, on August 12th 1944, Lieutenants Joseph Kennedy Jnr. and Wilford J. Willy, both of the S.A.U. 1 of the Fleet Air Arm Wing Seven, boarded their converted B-24 Liberator, s/n 32271 (ex USAAF B-24J 42-110007)*2 and began their preflight checks. The aircraft was filled with 21,270lbs of explosive. At 17:55 and 17:56 two Lockheed Ventura ‘mother’ aircraft took off, followed by a further navigation aircraft and then the ‘baby’ at 18:07. The ‘baby’ climbed to 2,000 ft, the two ‘mothers’ 200 feet higher and slightly behind. They were joined by two Mosquitoes, one for monitoring the weather, and the second, a USAAF F-8, to photograph the ‘baby’. This aircraft was flown by pilot Lieutenant Robert A. Tunnel and combat camera man Lieutenant David J. McCarthy. There was a further B-17 relay ship, a P-38 high altitude photo reconnaissance aircraft and five P-51 Mustangs to provide fighter cover.

The group set off toward the target at Mimoyecques , Northern France. They were to fly south-east toward the Suffolk coast, then turn south and head toward the target. Once level and stabilised, Kennedy and Willy handed over control to one of the ‘mother’ ships Then they reached the first control point (CP) at which time the group began to turn south; the ‘mother’ controlling the ‘baby’. Shortly after the turn was completed (about two minutes) Kennedy was heard to give the code “Spade Flush“, then at that 18:20 the ‘baby’ disintegrated in what was described as “two mid-air explosions” and a “large Fireball”.*4 The explosion, spread debris over a large area of the Suffolk countryside killing both crew members instantly. The following Mosquito also suffered damage and minor injuries to its crew. Following the explosion, all the aircraft were ordered back to base and the crews debriefed.

Many months (and indeed years) of investigations followed, but no firm conclusions could be drawn as to the precise cause of the explosion that ripped the aircraft apart. A number of speculative theories were drawn up, but the most plausible is that the electronic arming system was faulty, and when Kennedy or Willy, flicked the switch, an electronic short occurred that caused the bombs to detonate. Oddly the film that was in the following Mosquito has never been seen or made public – if indeed it was filming at that time.

The cause of death of both Joseph Kennedy and Wilford Willy still remain a mystery to this day, the secrecy behind one of the world’s worst explosions remaining locked away in archives.

Joseph Kennedy wanted to be a hero. He wanted to be talked about as the one who achieved and outshone his brother. Sadly, this dream cost him his life.

Page 1 of August 23, 1944 condolence letter to the parents of Lt. Joseph Kennedy, Jr.,

The letter sent to the Kennedy’s after Joseph’s death.*3

Page 2 of August 23, 1944 condolence letter to the parents of Lt. Joseph Kennedy, Jr.,

The letter sent to the Kennedy’s after Joseph’s death.*3

This fateful mission and its two crew members are remembered across the world. In France, the Mimoyecques museum contains a memorial honouring both pilots, and their names are carved in the Tablets of the Missing at the American Cemetery, Madingley, Cambridge. Kennedy has a ship the Destroyer ‘USS Joseph P. Kennedy Jr.’ DD850 named after him, and this is now a museum in Battleship Cove, Fall River, Massachusetts. Both aviators were awarded the Naval Cross posthumously,

joe kennedy

Lieutenant Joseph P Kennedy Jr, USNR, appears on the Wall of the Missing at the American Cemetery, Madingley, Cambridgeshire.

Lieutenant Jospeh P. Kennedy Jnr had no dependents but Lieutenant Wilford J. Willy left a widow and three children.

Sources and further reading.

*1 Azimuth being the clockwise horizontal angle from a given point (usually North) to a second given point.

*2US Navy and US Marine Corps BuNos, Third Series (30147 to 39998)‘  Joe Baugher, accessed 20/8/15

*3 Photos taken from ‘A People at War‘  Archives.Gov, Accessed 20/8/15

*4 Elgood, P., ‘Crisis Hunter: The Last Flight of Joseph P. Kennedy Jr.’ Columbia Point, 2014, pg 45, 65,

For a list of USAAF drones and pilotless missiles, see the Directory of US Military Rockets and Missiles website.

For the details on Drones see Wikipedia.

For more information and types, see Mistel aircraft, on Wikipedia.

Boeing B-29s in the UK.

During March 1944, an event took place in the UK that considering its historical importance, is little known about. It was actually quite a momentous event, especially in terms of aviation history, and in particular the Second World War.

As a follow on to RAF Glatton and Trail 6, we look into the short-lived presence of Boeing’s mighty aircraft the B-29 ‘Superfortress’, in what would appear to be its first and only wartime presence on British soil.

At the time of the bombing of Pearl Harbour in 1941, the United States was less than ready for a global war. The retaliation and defeat of not only Japan, but Nazi Germany as well, was going to be both costly and massive, requiring a huge increase in manufacturing of both arms and machinery.

This increase meant not only aircraft for the Air Force, but the infrastructure to support and train the aircrews too. A network of airfields and supporting organisations totalling some $100 million in 1940, would, by the war’s end be valued in the region of  $3,000 million. In terms of size, this infrastructure would cover an area of land equal to the combined areas of: New Hampshire, Vermont, Massachusetts, and Connecticut.*1

To complete the task, along with aiding her allies, the U.S. was going to need to design and manufacture many new models of aircraft, aircraft that would outshine anything previously made available to the U.S. forces. Long range bombers in particular, capable of travelling great distances were going to be required – and a lot of them. At the outbreak of the European war, the U.S. Army Air Corps was in comparison to the European forces, very small, commanding just 26,000 officers and enlisted men, and operating only 800 front-line aircraft. The Luftwaffe on the other hand, had expanded considerably over the previous years, now commanding some 3,600 aircraft. The British, who were still some way behind the Germans but growing rapidly, had available to them some 2,000 aircraft, whilst the French could muster slightly over 1,700. *1a

To meet this demand, U.S. aircraft manufacturers were going to have to start by modifying, and with some exceptions, redesigning the various aircraft types that were already available to the U.S.  forces. However, and likewise the British and German manufacturers, new models were going to have to be designed and put into production very quickly if victory was to be achieved in any of the world’s theatres.

Preempting war, the US Government put out tenders for long range bombers, in answer to which during the 1930s, the Boeing Model 299, first flew. Eventually being purchased by the US Government to fulfil the role, it was put into production as the iconic B-17 ‘Flying Fortress’, and was followed not long after by the B-24 ‘Liberator’; a more modern aircraft which took its maiden flight in 1939. But sitting on the drawing board at this time, was another aircraft that performed even better, the formidable B-29, a bomber designed to fly at altitudes up to 40,000ft, beyond the range of anti-aircraft guns and  faster than many fighters of the time. The aircraft was so advanced in design that depending upon its payload it was capable of flying distances of up to 5,000 miles, far beyond that of any other heavy bomber.

Whilst the U.S. aircraft manufacturers had already begun designing and testing these new models, it would be some time before the number and types of available aircraft would come anywhere close to being comparable to those of the Luftwaffe, R.A.F. or even later, the Imperial Japanese Air Force.

By August 1942 both the development and production of these two heavy bombers, the B-17 and B-24, were well underway, and so it was decided that they would go initially to the European theatre rather than the Far East. The competition for the attack on Japan now lay between the B-29 and Consolidated’s competitor the B-32 ‘Dominator’ – an enlarged and also pressurised version of their B-24. However, two years after the first design drawings were revealed, neither of these aircraft types had yet flown, and so the shorter ranged B-17 and B-24s were going to have to fill the gap until such times as their replacements could arrive.

The war in the Far East would provide its own set of problems. The distance that supplies would have to be taken would take time and before any invasion could take place, lost ground not only had to be recovered, but held. To achieve this, ground forces would need to be protected by an air umbrella, a defensive shield formed so tightly that air supremacy was guaranteed.

Getting supplies into China was difficult, by air it required long and dangerous flights over the ‘Hump’, the Himalayan mountain range, usually fulfilled by C-47s and DC-3s, their commercial equivalent. With the C-46 ‘Commando’ and C-87 coming on line later on, the frequency and quantity of these supplies could increase but it was still not enough for the Chinese, nor for the difficult task ahead.

By March 1943 the stage was set. The Fourteenth Air Force was created out of Maj. Gen. Claire Chennault’s China Air Task Force, which by the summer time, had begun attacks on coastal positions, ports and troop concentrations under Japanese control.  This air umbrella was in part achieved over Burma, and the desired attacks on Japan now looked more possible, but the B-17s and B-24s that had worked tirelessly lacked the range to hit the Japanese homeland;  the long range high performance B-29 was by now desperately needed.

During the Quebec Conference in August that year, U.S. officials put forward their proposal to stage American long range bombers on airfields in China, the area required for such bases being under Chinese control already and therefore not at the mercy of the Japanese forces. This offensive, designated the Matterhorn Project, would involve the still as yet untested  in battle, B-29s, their longer range and larger bomb capacity enabling them to ‘bomb Japan into submission’ in a similar way that Sir Arthur Harris had hoped for in Europe with the RAF’s bombing campaign against Germany’s industrial targets and cities.

To meet these aims a new force would be created, the Twentieth Air Force, which would be made up of two commands: the XX Bomber Command from China and the XXI Bomber Command who would be based in the Mariana Islands after they were retaken from Japanese control.

The aircraft destined to carry out this role, the B-29, was still very much an unknown quantity. Rushed into production with scant attention to testing, it was a monster of an aircraft, with a crew of eleven in pressurised compartments, electronic gun turrets and a massive 141 ft wingspan. The project was to be the biggest in U.S. aviation history, spares alone in the initial contract costing $19.5m, and one which General Arnold
referred to as the “$3 billion gamble”.*1b

The following film “Birth of the B-29 Superfortress” shows a B-29 production line and a test YB-29 in flight. It also contains some short graphic images at the start.

A batch of four XB-29 prototypes were built, and after initial test flights, a further fourteen ‘test’ aircraft, designated the YB-29, were also constructed. But problems with design drawings, missing parts and rushed testing meant that production was slowed to a minimum, part finished aircraft being stored whilst awaiting vital components. After test flights it became apparent that the B-29’s engines were prone to overheating and in several cases catching fire. This delayed further testing reducing flying time considerably until the problems could be solved. During flight tests, this problem with the engines was graphically seen, first on February 18th 1943, and then again a year later.

In February, XB-29 #41-003 (the second prototype XB) crashed into a meat packing factory killing all eight crew on board along with twenty civilians on the ground. The pilot, Eddie Allen, had already received the Air Medal for successfully landing the same XB-29 following another engine fire in the preceding December. A year later, January 29th 1944, engine problems caused yet another accident when  #41-36967, the last of the  fourteen*2 Wichita YB-29s  manufactured, crashed after losing all four engines whilst in the air. This problem with overheating engines becoming the proverbial  ‘thorn in the side’ of the Boeing production team.

By the summer of 1943, B-29 training squadrons were being set up, the first, the 58th Bombardment Operational Training Wing (Heavy) later the 58th BW (Very Heavy), was formed with the 40th, 444th, 462nd, 468th and 472nd Bombardment Groups, each with four or five squadrons of their own.

After a period of training four of these groups (the 472nd was disbanded April 1944) would transfer to India flying via Africa to join the Twelfth Air Force initially flying supplies over ‘the Hump’, before taking part in operations against Japan from the Chinese airfields.

Departure for these groups occurred over the March – April 1944 period, during which time one of these aircraft would divert to the U.K. causing a huge stir whilst ‘touring’ several U.K. airbases.

Whilst precise sources seem scarce, it is thought that flying B-29s across the southern route raised fears of a Luftwaffe attack whilst en-route, and so a plan of ‘disinformation’ was set in motion to fool the Germans into thinking that the B-29s were to be based in England, ready to be used against German targets. The first part of this ruse was in early March 1944, when YB-29 #41-36963 ‘Hobo Queen‘ took off from Salina Airbase in Kansas and flew to England. It initially took the southern route toward Africa, but then deviated north heading to Newfoundland. The YB-29, piloted by Colonel Frank Cook, then flew across to the UK initially landing at RAF St. Mawgan, in Cornwall.

During its short stay in the U.K. it was known to have visited RAF Horsham St. Faith near Norwich,  RAF Bassingbourn on the 8th March, RAF Knettishall and RAF Glatton on 11th March before its final departure from RAF St. Mawgan to India in April that year. The route took the YB-29 to Marrakech, Cairo (2nd April), Karachi (5th Apr) finally arriving at  Kharagpur, India, on 6th Apr 1944 . Once here, it was assigned to the 769th Bomb Squadron, 462nd Bomb Group who were then based at Piardoba in India, where it was modified as a tanker to ferry fuel over ‘the Hump’. The YB-29, the only test model to fly overseas,  gave a successful service, eventually being declared war weary and returned to the United States, its eventual fate being unknown, presumably, like many war weary models, the aircraft was scrapped.*3

Whilst in the U.K. the YB-29 was certainly a major draw, over 1,000 key personnel viewing the aircraft at RAF Glatton alone, its enormous size dwarfing anything that had been seen in U.K. skies before.

The ruse was considered a success. The many B-29s that followed across the southern route did so without any interference from German aircraft, although how much of that was actually down to the ruse itself, is hard to distinguish. It is even thought in some circles that photos of the ‘Hobo Queen‘ appeared in the newspaper of the National Socialist German Workers’ Party,  The Völkischer Beobachter, although an initial search of the paper through the Austrian National Library proved fruitless.

Crews and ground staff swarm around B-29 #41-36963 at Glatton airfield 11th March 1944*4.

Although B-29s were initially considered for the European theatre none operated from British soil until after the wars end, when a joint British and American operation, Project ‘Ruby‘*5, investigated deep penetration bombs against reinforced concrete structures. Three B-29s were prepared in the United States along with four B-17s and a select detachment of admin, maintenance, technical staff and air crew,  who arrived at RAF Marham, Norfolk, on March 15th 1946. Initial plans were to test a series of bombs on the submarine assembly plant at Farge, but due to the close proximity of housing and an electricity plant, the U-boat shelter at Heligoland was used instead. The bombing trials began on March 25th by which time an original three B-17s from RAF Mildenhall had also joined the group.

A number of both American and British bombs were tested in the trials:

  • The US 22,000lb. ‘Amazon’ bomb
  • The US rocket assisted 4,500lb. ‘Disney’ bomb (used by B-17s in the latter stages of the war)
  • The 4,500lb. ‘Disney’ bomb without rocket assistance
  • The American 22,000lb. fabricated ‘Grand Slam’ (designated T14)
  • The American 12,000lb. fabricated ‘Tall Boy’ (designated T10)
  • The British 12,000lb, ‘Tall Boy’
  • The British 2,000lb. Armour Piercing  bomb
  • The inert loaded 2,000lb. SAP (M103) bomb
  • The Picratol filled 2,000lb. SAP (M103) bomb
  • The 1,650lb. Model bomb

The results of the trials were quite conclusive, none of these bombs in their current form, were capable of penetrating the 23 ft thick concrete of the Farge roof, and therefore, all would need adapting, redeveloping or redesigning if such operations were to be carried out again.

Post war, B-29s were brought into the UK and operated as Boeing Washington B1s, operating with nine RAF Squadrons: No. 15, 35, 44, 57, 90, 115, 149, 192 and 207 at various airfields including RAF Marham, RAF Coningsby, RAF Watton and RAF Waddington, eventually being replaced by the high flying English Electric Canberra. The B-29 then disappeared from operational service in the UK.

Without doubt, the development of the B-29 had a major impact on the world as we know it today, and even though its first arrival in the UK in March 1944 caused a major stir in the aviation world, it incredibly remains a little known about clear fact. With little documentation available, there is clearly much more research to be done.

Since the original posting of this article, I have been contacted by Daniel Partridge whose grandfather (Leon Suthers) was at Randolph Field in the United States, after the war’s end. He has sent me some photos of ‘Hobo Queen’ after she returned to the US. According to information Daniel has supplied, she was used as a training airframe from January 1945 until 1954, after which she was scrapped. From the photos, you can see that much of the aircraft has been stripped away, presumably as part of this programme, yet the 45 camel ‘mission scores’ have been left. Further information from Daniel confirms that these Camels represent flights ‘over the hump’. My sincere thanks to Daniel for the information.

Hobo Queen

Hobo Queen Post War (Photo courtesy Daniel Partridge)

Hobo Queen

Hobo Queen Post War (Photo courtesy Daniel Partridge)

Sources and further reading.

*1 Nalty, B., et al. “With Courage The U.S. Army Air Forces in World War II” 1994. Air Force Historical Studies Office (p61)

*1a ibid (p38)

*1b ibid (p147)

*2 Only 14 YB-29BWs were built (#41-36954 – #41-36967) and all at Wichita. They were painted olive drab upper surfaces and light gull grey lower surfaces.

*3 MSN 3334.

*4 Image courtesy of 457th BG Association.

*5 Comparative Test of the Effectiveness of Large Bombs Against Large Reinforced Concrete Structures (PDF), Report of the Air Proving Ground Command, Elgin Field, Florida – Anglo-American Bomb Test Project “Ruby”. October 31st, 1946.

Simons. G.M., “B-29 Superfortress: Giant Bomber of World War Two and Korea“. Pen and Sword Aviation. (2012)

Mann. R.A., The B-29 Superfortress: A Comprehensive Registry of the Planes and Their Mission McFarland & Company Inc. (2004)

Harris, S.R., Jr. “B-29s Over Japan, 1944-1945: A Group Commander’s Diary” McFarland & Company Inc. (2011)

Mann. R.A.,.”The B-29 Superfortress Chronology, 1934-1960” McFarland & Company Inc. (2009)

11th April 1944 – Loss of B-17 ‘Tenny Belle’ RAF Kimbolton

On 11th April 1944, a mix of 917 B-17s and B-24s of the 1st,  2nd and 3rd Bomb Divisions (BD) of the USAAF, departed their airfields in England to strike at a range of targets across Germany – it was mission 298. The 1st BD, made up of 341 B-17s, attacked targets at Cottibus, Dobberphel, Stettin, Trechel and Sorau. the Focke Wulf aircraft assembly plant in Germany.

One of those aircraft taking part was #42-31083 “Tenny Belle” of the 525nd BS, 379th BG, based at RAF Kimbolton (Station 117) in Cambridgeshire. The aircraft had already flown thirty-seven operations before this one, but this would sadly be her last.

After taking off from Kimbolton at 07:41, the aircraft climbed to gain altitude and to form up. Its flight would take it easterly over Norfolk and the coast.

On board the aircraft, a B-17G-1-BO “Flying Fortress”, ‘FR*A’, was: 2nd Lt. John E. Daly Jr. (pilot); 2nd Lt. Robert W. Koerber (co-pilot); 2nd Lt. Williams F. Evans (navigator); S/Sgt. Carl B. Christensen (nose gunner/bombadier); T.Sgt. Omer L. Young (Flt. Engineer/top turret gunner); T.Sgt. Adriel Langendoerfer (radio operator); S.Sgt. Harvey W. Tuber (Ball turret gunner); S.Sgt. John N. MacCallum (right waist gunner); S.Sgt. Frank J. Hearne Jr. (left waist gunner) and S.Sgt. Howard L. Polizzo (tail gunner).

This was not Daly’s first crew though, they had formed at Pyote Air Base, Texas and transferred out to the UK together. On this operation, S/Sgt. Carl B. Christensen replaced the normal bombardier 1st Lt. Joseph Jennings who was at RAF Alconbury receiving Radar training.

#42-31083 ‘Tenny Belle‘ and probably Daly’s crew (centre facing camera) after the 25th mission.  (IWM UPL 31620)

Once airborne, the aircraft levelled out and began to find its place in the formation before heading off over the sea to Germany. At 09:03 and at 9,000 feet, in formation travelling at about 115 mph, the aircraft for unknown reasons, suddenly and violently lurched to the left as if the pilot had tried to steer away from another aircraft; it then lurched once again, this time to the right throwing the crew around inside the fuselage in an uncontrollable manner. The forces acting on the weary aircraft were too great though, and a fracture caused it to split into two sections.

The “Tenny Belle“, now unstable and with no aerodynamic stability whatsoever, simply fell from the sky hitting the ground with such force as to completely destroy it. In the impact, it also killed nine of the ten crewmen left onboard. The tenth, 2nd LT. Evans, managed to don his chute and escape the stricken aircraft whilst it hung in the air on the smallest amount of lift possible immediately following the accident.

According to the official crash report Form AF-14, the aircraft came down four miles west-south-west of Downham Market in the small hamlet of Barroway Drove. However, some sources say the aircraft fell at Fen Farm some six miles south-west of the town, neither can be confirmed at this stage, although due to the nature of the accident, it is possible parts were located in both areas.

There was no record of any explosions, and all engines were reported by 2nd Lt. Evans as “running very fast”.  In his statement following the crash he said:

The formation entered the clouds and we levelled off. We were in the clouds only a few minutes when the ship swerved violently to the left. I thought the pilot saw another wing-tip and was trying to avoid it. We then swerved more violently to the right. I then figured out it was out of control and thought that the plane had broken in two. I had my chute on before this. The last I saw of the Bombadier, he was trying to put his chute on. We were going straight down, and the engines were all running fast. There did not appear to be any fire in the wings. I tried to get to the escape hatch, but everything at his point is very confused and I do not know if I got out this way. I remember looking down to see of my chute was on, and  noting that it was backwards. It opened with some help from me and a moment later I hit the ground. I looked around to the plane coming down, the tail part landed way behind the ship and numbers of burning pieces were falling around. There was a farmer near and I tried to walk over to him, but I was feeling pretty shaky. He got a car and took me to a hospital. I didn’t feel any explosions and no alarm was given.”

The official board of enquiry concluded that:

The cause of the accident is undetermined and consequently, responsibility therfor[sic] cannot be established.”

Post crash, the bodies of the crew were removed and the B-17 guarded, none of the bombs aboard detonated. It was later salvaged on the 18th April 1944, but the strength of the impact had completely destroyed its fragile structure.

The normal bombadier, Joseph Jennings learnt about the loss of the crew that day, the news affected him badly, and he never talked about them or their loss afterwards.

Pilot, 2nd Lt. John Daly, (s/n: 0-805776) had flown 273 hours and 15 minutes on B-17s, gaining his pilots licence on June 30th 1943. He was only 19 years of age and thought to be one of the youngest pilots to serve in the USAAF at that time.

Sources and further reading.

Air Accident Form (A.A.F.) No. 14 USAAF.

American Air Museum Website accessed 14/1/25

Downham Market Heritage Centre

Sgt. Archibald Mathies, USAAF, 510th BS, 351st BG (Medal Of Honour)

Staff Sgt. Archibald Mathies (U.S. Air Force file photo)*1

Born in the Scottish town of Stonehouse, South Lanarkshire, on the 3rd June 1918, Archibald (Archie) Mathies was to become a Second World War hero. He was awarded the Medal of Honour (MOH) for his actions whilst at RAF Polebrook (USAAF Station 110) in Northamptonshire, England.

It would be on the 20th February 1944, shortly after arriving at Polebrook, that he would earn this honour but his life would be dramatically cut short.

Not long after his birth in Scotland, Mathies moved with his family to the United States, to a small town in Western Pennsylvania called Finleyville, in Washington County.

After leaving school, he began work in a local coal mine. The work was hard, and the pay was low; Mathies was not inspired. Then, following the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbour, as many other brave young American men did, he joined the Army, enlisting in Pittsburgh on the 30th December 1940. Mathies would transition through a number of stations and training centres before finally completing a course in aerial gunnery on the 22nd March 1943. His last U.S. posting was to the 796th Bombardment Squadron at Alexandria, Louisiana for operational training duties flying B-17s. He would leave here on the 8th December 1943 bound for England and the European Theatre of Operations.

Mathies arrived in the U.K. eight days later. His initial assignment was with the Eighth Air Force Replacement Depot, before being attached to the 1st Replacement and Training Squadron. On the 19th January 1944, he received his first and only operational squadron posting; the 510th Bomb Squadron, 351st Bomb Group, based at RAF Polebrook, as an engineer/gunner. Promotion was swift, and on 17th February 1944, probably following his first mission, Mathies was awarded the rank of Staff Sergeant.

A few days later, on 20th February 1944, the allies began the enormous aerial campaign known as ‘Big Week’. During this short period a massive number of aircraft would attack targets deep in the heart of Nazi Germany. One of the first, (Mission 226) would see a total of 417 aircraft fly from airfields across England. From RAF Polebrook, 39 B-17s took off to attack Leipzig. In the lead planes were Maj. Leonard B. Roper (s/n O-734101 ) of the 510th BS forming the high group, and Maj. James T. Stewart (s/n O-659405) of the 508th BS, leading the low group.

Flying in the number three ship of the lower Squadron, in B-17 (42-31763) ‘Ten Horsepower‘ was: Pilot: Clarry Nelson, Co-Pilot: Roland Bartley, Navigator: Walter Truemper, Engineer / Top Turret Gunner: Archie Mathies, Bombardier: Joe Martin, Radio Operator: Joe Rex, Ball Turret Gunner: Carl Moore, Waist Gunner: Tom Sowell, Waist Gunner: Russ Robinson, and Tail Gunner: Magnus Hagbo.

mathies page

B-17 “Ten Horsepower” – cropped from the photo below- (TU-A, serial number 42-31763) taken prior to its crash”2.

On approaching the target, the formation was hit hard by fighters and flak, who would attack the formation for over an hour, hitting many aircraft in the subsequent melee. Ten Horsepower, was targeted repeatedly receiving many hits from 20mm cannon shells. In these attacks the co-pilot was killed and the pilot knocked unconscious from his wounds. Fearing the bomber was doomed, the bombardier jettisoned the bombs and then bailed out, later being captured by the Germans and becoming a prisoner of war. The remaining crew remained with the B-17 which soon began a deathly spiral toward the ground.

Mathies and the navigator (Walter Truemper) would eventually take over control of the aircraft and nurse it back to England. Once over their base at RAF Polebrook, the crew were instructed to bail out but both Mathies and Truemper refused to leave the injured pilot. After deliberation, they were given permission to try to land, the remaining two crew members prepared themselves for a heavy landing.

Guided in by a fellow aviator it was going to be very difficult. The first two attempts had to be aborted, but on the third attempt, as they approached the airfield, the aircraft struck the ground, killing all three crew members onboard.

The last moments of B-17G “Ten Horsepower” (TU-A, #42-21763) piloted by Second Lieutenant Walter E Truemper  and Sergeant Archibald Mathies, as it is guided by a fellow aircraft after the pilot was severely injured. Truemper and Mathies unsuccessfully attempted to land the aircraft at Polebrook and were posthumously awarded the Medal of Honour for their bravery, 20th February 1944. (IWM FRE 4724)

The crash was a severe blow for the base, both air and ground crews were devastated. On returning from the mission, five other aircraft (42-38028, 42-38005, 42-39760, 42-39853 and 42-6151). were forced to land at nearby Glatton (Conington) only a short distance away.

This was only Mathies’ second mission and sadly, his last.

For his bravery, Mathies was awarded the Medal of Honour; his name now appears on page 280 of the St. Paul’s Cathedral Roll of Honour. Also, as a dedication to him, one of the temporary lodging units at the Joint Base Anacostia-Bolling is named after him, as is the Airman Leadership School at RAF Feltwell,  and the Non commissioned Officer Academy at Keesler AFB, Mississippi. In addition, the bridge on Truemper Drive crossing Military Highway at Lackland Air Force Base, Texas; the USCIS Dallas District Office and the Mathies Coal Company in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, are all named in his honour.

Archibald Mathies  citation reads:

For conspicuous gallantry and intrepidity at risk of life above and beyond the call of duty in action against the enemy in connection with a bombing mission over enemy-occupied Europe on 20 February 1944. The aircraft on which Sgt. Mathies was serving as engineer and ball turret gunner was attacked by a squadron of enemy fighters with the result that the copilot was killed outright, the pilot wounded and rendered unconscious, the radio operator wounded and the plane severely damaged. Nevertheless, Sgt. Mathies and other members of the crew managed to right the plane and fly it back to their home station, where they contacted the control tower and reported the situation. Sgt. Mathies and the navigator volunteered to attempt to land the plane. Other members of the crew were ordered to jump, leaving Sgt. Mathies and the navigator aboard. After observing the distressed aircraft from another plane, Sgt. Mathies’ commanding officer decided the damaged plane could not be landed by the inexperienced crew and ordered them to abandon it and parachute to safety. Demonstrating unsurpassed courage and heroism, Sgt. Mathies and the navigator replied that the pilot was still alive but could not be moved and they would not desert him. They were then told to attempt a landing. After two unsuccessful efforts, the plane crashed into an open field in a third attempt to land. Sgt. Mathies, the navigator, and the wounded pilot were killed“.*3

Mathies was truly a brave and dedicated man, who in the face of adversity, refused to leave his wounded pilot and friend. Daring to land a badly damaged aircraft, he sadly lost his life showing both great courage and determination.

The crew of ‘Ten Horsepower‘ were:

Pilot: Clarry Nelson,
Co-Pilot: Roland Bartley,
Navigator: Walter Truemper
Engineer / Top Turret Gunner: Archie Mathies
Bombardier: Joe Martin (POW)
Radio Operator: Joe Rex,
Ball Turret Gunner: Carl Moore,
Waist Gunner: Tom Sowell,
Waist Gunner: Russ Robinson,
Tail Gunner: Magnus Hagbo

Notes:

*1 Photo from Malmstrom Air Force Base website.

*2 Photo IWM Freeman Collection FRE 4725

*3 Citation taken from: US Army Centre for Military History website.

RAF East Kirkby – Part 3 – the End of an Era.

In Part 2, we saw how crews at East Kirkby took a battering over Germany and how the Allies turned their attention to the forthcoming invasion.

In this, the final part, the war finally comes to an end and RAF East Kirkby eventually closes, but not without making its mark.

With spring at an end, thoughts turned back to the impending invasion and the bombing of pinpoint targets in France: Railways, munitions factories, troop concentrations and transport links became the focus for Harris’s Air Force. Throughout the month of April both East Kirkby squadrons were in operations, and whilst not significantly high, a number of aircraft were lost adding to the lengthening list of casualties and those now missing.

The end of this period of the war was remarkable for several reasons, notably when Wing Commander Leonard Cheshire of 617 Sqn, flew a Mosquito at low level and marked the target, a factory in Toulouse, with great success. This delighted Harris, who gave the all clear to 5 Group to operate independently of the Pathfinders of 8 Group, a decision that did little to heal the growing rift between Don Bennett and Ralph Cochrane who had taken the idea to Harris in the first place.

Other targets then became the focus for 5 Group including the railway yards at La Chapelle. In the operation Cheshire put this method  to the test once more. with 617 Sqn again to marking the target in conjunction with 8 Group’s Pathfinders. In the operation, 247 Lancasters from 5 Group were ordered to attack a pin point target. In the attack, 57 Sqn lost two aircraft. Of these two Lancasters the first, LL893 ‘DX-J’  was lost with all seven lives over St-Omer whilst the second, Lancaster MK. III ND582 ‘DX-S’ crashed after attempting a landing at Croydon. After overshooting the runway the aircraft, piloted by Canadian F.O. H. Young, struck at least three homes in Lavender Vale, a street adjoining the airfield. Three of the crew died immediately and a further one died from his injuries in hospital.

Operation POINTBLANK. Groundsmen refuel Lancaster ND560 ‘DX-N’, 57 Squadron in preparation for a night attack on the railway yards at La Chapelle, France. IWM (CH 12868)

Summer then dawned, and overnight, May 22nd-23rd, Cheshire once more, put his method  to the test. 617 Sqn were again to mark the target, but a heavily defended Brunswick led to heavy losses for both the East Kirkby squadrons, 57 losing three Lancaster Mk.IIIs and 630 Sqn another two. Only five airmen made it out alive, each one being captured by the German ground forces and so becoming prisoners of war.

These losses were however a mere pin-prick compared to June. The mission of 21st-22nd to Wesseling near Cologne proved to be yet another massacre for 5 Group who sent a total of 133 Lancasters to attack the city’s oil facilities. A number of squadrons took heavy loses including both East Kirkby’s 57 and 630 Sqns with six and five losses respectively. One of these aircraft was abandoned whilst another ditched in the sea allowing all crewmen to be rescued, but the overall loss proved to be devastating.

The spring – summer of 1944 was defining, not only had 5 Group shown that low-level marking could be done, but the attacks on targets in France meant that the Luftwaffe were at a disadvantage. Their night tactics, relying on long range bomber flights, could not manage with the shorter ‘quick’ attacks, and so losses from Bomber Command began to lessen.

This reduction allowed for restaffing, with a large number of officers, NCOs and airmen being both posted in and out of the two squadrons. It also allowed for training flights to take place, some 476 hours of operations compared to 729 hours for non-operational flights for 630 Sqn alone.

Like many places across the UK, the coming of D-Day, and the fragile success of the invasion led to an increase in morale at the station. Ground crews being acknowledged for their long hours and hard work in keeping aircraft flying and operationally ready, without them, these operations could not have taken place at all.

This extra effort and improved state continued for several months, and by August, it was acknowledged that morale had lifted, discipline was at a high and health was overall very good. Casualties were also down, a real boost considering the extra effort and number of operations that had been taking place over the last few months. The summer was at last ending on a high.

August’s improvement coincided with the liberation of Paris, a major landmark in the war’s progress. Ground forces were charging ahead. In the air, Bomber Command had played a small part in the offensive supporting ground troops as needed and now they were released from the tight grip SHAEF had held over them. Discussions followed as to where best place their bombs, oil and  communication were one option or alternatively, a return to the bombing of the cities and morale busting; oil won over, and so, much to Harris’s disappointment, the bombing of oil based targets began.

The looseness of the criteria however, allowed Harris to circumnavigate the ‘rules’ and turn his attention to cities with an oil link. He had got his way and the Air Ministry had got theirs.

Although individual operation losses were relatively low, 57 Sqn tallied some 56 aircraft by the end of 1944, whilst 630 Sqn reached 57. Non-operational loses for the two units were also on an equal par.

On the penultimate day of the year, East Kirkby was to witness, a short distance away from the airfield, the crash of a B-17 attempting to land. Aircraft #42-97479 (UX-L) of the 327thBS 92nd BG based at Podington (Station 109), crashed in a field between the two small hamlets of Old Bolinbroke and Hareby. On board that day were nine crew men: 2nd Lt. Joseph Martin Van Stratton (Pilot); 2nd Lt. Edward A Porter (Co-pilot); Sgt. Charles H Chambers (Bombardier); 2nd Lt. John E Cowan (Navigator); Sgt. Arthur R Estrada (Radio Operator); Sgt. Harold Raymond Barner (Ball Turret Gunner); Sgt. Wilfred A Bedard (Wasit Gunner); Sgt. Thomas G Standish ((Top Turret Gunner) and Sgt. William D White (Tail Gunner), who all lost their lives.

The aircraft, a Lockheed/Vega B-17G-15-VE Flying Fortress named “Belle of Liberty“, had returned from operations to the Bullay railway bridge located south-west of Koblenz, in Germany. After suffering engine failure, the pilot decided to abort the mission and attempt a landing at East Kirkby. In poor visibility and with one engine out, he overshot the runway and pulled up to attempt a second try. A second propeller then began windmilling and in trying to gain height to avoid a hill, the B-17 stalled and crashed.

A small memorial plaque has since been laid at the site in commemoration of those lost.

The wreck of the “Belle of Liberty” 30th December 1944.  (IWM FRE 5762)

The winter of 1944-45 was one of the worst, ground troops were by now entrenched in the Ardennes around Bastogne, with the German army preparing for one last push through the forests. Fog and snow kept many airfields non-operational in the UK, aircraft struggling to get much needed support across to the continent.

At East Kirkby, January started on high spirits, but on the 9th, 630 Sqn Lancaster PD317 ‘LE-G’ struggled to get airborne when one of its engines cut out on take off. After jettisoning its bombs, the pilot, F.O. G Billings, opened the throttle to attempt a circuit and landing. However, the port wing lost lift and dropped causing the aircraft to cartwheel injuring five airmen and killing two. With one further loss on the 14th, this brought the spring tally to two aircraft. However, good news did soon come as six of the seven crew were repatriated by the April. The seventh airmen, W.O. E Edwards, struck the tail plane on baling out and died the next day.

Otherwise, 57 Sqn, scraped through with a clean sheet and no operational losses were encountered, but they did suffer an unfortunate incident when ‘DX-N’ PB382 (the predecessor of DX-N below) entered Swedish airspace and was shot down by flak on the night of February 8th-9th.

The losses encountered by 57 and 630 Sqn, were only pipped by the tragic accident that was reported to have happened on the 17th of April. Although the operational records record no evidence of the accident, even to the point of showing some of the aircraft involved taking part and completing their operations, it is recorded in some resources that six Lancasters of 57 Squadron were destroyed following a fire in the fuselage of Lancaster PB360. As a result of the fire, four men were killed and a further five injured, along with several civilian workers near the site.

The fire started at 17:45, causing a series of explosions which destroyed the five other Lancasters parked nearby. The Hangar on the airfield was also badly damaged, as was a neighbouring farm. The fires were so severe that fire crews were brought in from nearby airfields and the area was not declared ‘safe’ until the following day. The Lancasters involved were: PB360 (MK.III) ‘DX-N’; ND472 (MK.III) ‘DX-I’; LM673 (MK.III) ‘DX-U’; RF195 (MK.I) ‘DX-‘; PD347 (MK.I) ‘DX-P’ and NN765 (MK.I) ‘DX-‘.*3

By now German resistance was minimal. Fighters were rarely encountered in any number and flak batteries were reducing in their accuracy and intensity. By May, the war was at and end, and quickly both ‘Exodus’ and training flights became the norm along with cross country and high level bombing training flights taking the front stage. For 630 Sqn July signified the end, after a period of intense recruiting the squadron was disbanded after serving for approximately eighteen months of the war.

During that time they had shown great courage in action. On average they had flown 1,087 hours of operational flying per month and 286 hours on non-operational flights. This amounted to 2,147 operations over enemy territory during which 64 aircraft had been lost. With another six crashing, the toll was high, and their medal tally reflected that, with in excess of 60 awards being granted.

In a last days before disbandment a sports challenge with 57 Squadron allowed 630 to show their colours one last time, winning the overall trophy, and with a party to celebrate that night, the squadron went out on a high. The final day saw the last parade and the handing over of the squadron crest to the Air Ministry for safe keeping. With that, 630 squadron disbanded.

Their place at East Kirkby didn’t stay vacant for long though, for on the 27th July, 460 Sqn arrived to join 57 Sqn and serve its lasts days here at this Lincolnshire airfield.

57 Sqn would continue on, taking on the Lincoln bomber in August as a replacement for the Lancaster although numbers remained low at this time. Fighter affiliation, high level bombing training and cross country flights became the main focus, along with ferrying flights into the European continent bringing back personnel and equipment; a schedule that continued for the next four months, its time finally being called on November 25th 1945.

Throughout the war 57 Sqn had served with distinction, providing crews for not just one but two different squadrons, one of which went on to become perhaps the most famous unit in the RAF’s history. It was a success however, that came at a cost, with the highest loss rate of the whole of Bomber Command, they had taken part in some of Europe’s most ferocious aerial battles and still went on to perform admirably.

On disbandment, 103 Squadron then at Elsham Woods, was immediately renumbered as 57 Sqn, and the unit number lived on. The majority of personnel from the original 57 Sqn were transferred to the RAF’s Holding Station RAF Blyton Holding Unit, along with personnel from several other serving squadrons. Seven three-men crews remained at East Kirkby to ferry the Lancasters away whilst six crews transferred to Scampton to form the basis of the new squadron along with three Lincoln bombers.

460 Sqn an Australian unit, had also served well during its war time life. Being originally formed on November 25th 1941, it was made up of Australian crews, flown Wellingtons, Halifaxes and then Lancaster I and IIIs. Its move to East Kirkby from Binbrook signifying its end, as training flights took over bombing missions and personnel began to be transferred out. By October it too had disbanded.

In an acknowledgement of their bravery, the closing remarks in the Operation Record Books state how the Australian had been warmly welcomed to our shores and how they had cemented a great bond between the two allies against a common enemy. Appreciation and thanks was warmly given to those who had served in the unit.

With the war’s end, East Kirkby was rundown, but between spring 1946 and February 1948, a detachment of Mosquito B.IVs from Coningsby’s 139 (Jamaica) Sqn, operated here, joined  between August 1947 and February 1948 by 231 Operational Conversion Unit (OCU) also on detachment from Coningsby. Flying a mix of Airspeed Oxfords, Avro Ansons & de Havilland Mosquito B.IVs, they were the last RAF units to use the airfield before it entered care and maintenance.

Then in 1951, the US Strategic Command 3rd Air Force took over the site, intending to use it as a stand-by airfield.  As part of the plan, the runway was extended by 1,230 yards along with an expansion to the apron. Both the 3931st ABG and 3917th ABS were based here but only visiting C-47 ‘Skytrains’ (a derivative of the Dakota) of the 7th Air Division’s Rescue Squadrons, ever arrived.

Eventually, on 31 October 1958, the airfield was returned to Air Ministry under ‘Big Shuffle’ , the reorganisation of the Air Force and its sites in the UK and Europe.*4

With that, East Kirkby closed for good, being sold off in 1964 when it turned once again to agriculture. However, bought by the Panton Brothers, it was turned into a living museum including a taxiable Lancaster to commemorate not only the third brother – Christopher Panton, who was killed on a bombing raid over Nuremberg on 30th – 31st March, 1944 – but all those who served in Bomber Command during World War II.

Part of the museum includes the chapel, a stained glass window and memorial board listing all those who died whilst serving at the airfield in both 57 and 630 Sqn, are poignant reminders of the toll on human life at this one small Lincolnshire airfield.

The full page can be read in Trail 1 – Lower Lincolnshire.

References and further reading (East Kirkby)

*1 Aviation Safety Network website accessed 19/10/24.

*2 Worrall, R., “Battle of Berlin 1943-44” Osprey Publishing. 2019.

*3 Chorley, W.R., “Bomber Command Losses pof the Second World War – Vol. 6 1945” Midland Counties Publications 1998.

*4 Francis. P & Crisp. G., “Military Command and Control Organisation
Volume 4  – The United States Air Forces in the UK” on behalf of English Heritage.

*5 The East Kirkby Museum have a website which gives far more detail, opening times, and other other visitor information.

National archives: AIR 27/538/38; AIR 27/538/44; AIR 27/538/43; AIR 27/2152/8; AIR 27/2152/7; AIR 27/2152/29; AIR 27/540/13; AIR 27/540/21; AIR 27/1910/11; AIR 27/540/8; AIR 27/540/7

American Air Museum Website Accessed 20.10.24

International Bomber Command Centre has several personal stories on their website, it is well worth a read.

Lincolnshire Aviation Heritage Centre Website.